Effect of Lens Care Systems on the Clinical Performance of a Contact Lens

被引:48
|
作者
de la Jara, Percy Lazon [1 ,3 ]
Papas, Eric [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Diec, Jennie [1 ]
Naduvilath, Thomas [1 ]
Willcox, Mark D. P. [3 ]
Holden, Brien A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brien Holden Vis Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Vis Cooperat Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
silicone hydrogel; discomfort; dryness; adverse events; CORNEAL INFILTRATIVE EVENTS; SILICONE HYDROGEL LENSES; RISK-FACTORS; OCULAR SURFACE; DAILY WEAR; MULTIPURPOSE SOLUTIONS; EXTENDED WEAR; DEPOSITS; REGIMEN;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0b013e318288e10c
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate subjective responses, rates of solution-induced corneal staining (SICS), and corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) associated with a silicone hydrogel when worn under a daily disposable (DD) or daily wear (DW) modality. Methods. Data were obtained from seven prospective clinical trials, involving 283 subjects wearing Senofilcon A contact lenses (Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, FL). Four groups wore the contact lens on a DW basis using multipurpose solutions (DW-MPS, n = 160), two groups using hydrogen peroxide (DW-H2O2, n = 83), and one group as a DD (n = 40). Participants were followed for 3 months using the same protocol. Subjective ratings were compared between DD and DW groups using a linear mixed model. Rates of SICS and CIE were calculated as the percent frequency of first events within the 3-month study. Association of SICS and CIE with subjective responses was analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results. End-of-day comfort and dryness ratings were significantly better for DD (8.5 +/- 1.7 and 8.6 +/- 1.7, respectively) compared with DW-H2O2 (7.7 +/- 1.8, p = 0.01; 7.6 +/- 1.9, p = 0.006, respectively) and DW-MPS (7.7 +/- 1.7, p = 0.004; 7.6 +/- 2.0, p = 0.003, respectively). Compared with DD, a higher incidence of CIE and SICS was found for DW-MPS (0.0 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.021; 0.9 vs. 8.6%, p = 0.002, respectively). Comfort at insertion and end of day and end-of-day dryness scores were significantly lower for participants who experienced SICS (8.2 +/- 1.6, 7.0 +/- 1.9, and 7.0 +/- 2.2) than those who did not (8.8 +/- 1.2, p = 0.004; 7.9 +/- 1.7, p = 0.002; and 7.9 +/- 1.8, p = 0.003, respectively). Comfort at insertion scores were significantly lower for participants who experienced CIEs than those who did not (8.2 +/- 1.5 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.4, p = 0.032). Conclusions. Senofilcon A clinical response is modulated by the lens care products. All lens care products tested reduced subjective responses relative to DD modality, whereas MPS increased the incidence of CIEs and SICS. Senofilcon A performs best when used on a DD basis. (Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:344-350)
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 350
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical application of contact lens telescopes
    Temel, Ahmet
    Bavbek, Tayfun
    Kanpolat, Ayfer
    [J]. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1993, 16 (02) : 148 - 150
  • [42] Multifocal and bifocal contact lens performance in combination with a uniocular toric lens
    Fisher, Kay
    Decenzo-Verbeten, Teresa
    [J]. Optometry and Vision Science, 2000, 77 (12 SUPPL.)
  • [43] RELATIONSHIP OF EYELIDS TO CONTACT LENS PERFORMANCE
    DICKINSON, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1971, 26 (01): : 22 - +
  • [44] INFLUENCE OF SOFT CONTACT-LENS DESIGN ON CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE
    YOUNG, G
    HOLDEN, B
    COOKE, G
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1993, 70 (05) : 394 - 403
  • [45] Effects of Lens-Care Solutions on Hydrogel Lens Performance
    Kitamata-Wong, Britney
    Yuen, Tiffany
    Li, Wing
    Svitova, Tatyana
    Zhou, Yixiu
    Lin, Meng C.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2017, 94 (11) : 1036 - 1046
  • [46] Non-compliance with lens care and maintenance in diabetic contact lens wearers
    O'Donnell, C
    Efron, N
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2004, 24 (06) : 504 - 510
  • [47] Care Regimen and Lens Material Influence on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Deposition
    Zhao, Zhenjun
    Camt, Nicole A.
    Aliwarga, Yulina
    Wei, Xiaojia
    Naduvilath, Thomas
    Garrett, Qian
    Korth, John
    Willcox, Mark D. P.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2009, 86 (03) : 251 - 259
  • [48] The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Report of the Contact Lens Materials, Design, and Care Subcommittee
    Jones, Lyndon
    Brennan, Noel A.
    Gonzalez-Meijome, Jose
    Lally, John
    Maldonado-Codina, Carole
    Schmidt, Tannin A.
    Subbaraman, Lakshman
    Young, Graeme
    Nichols, Jason J.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (11) : 37 - 70
  • [49] EMERGENCY CARE OF THE CONTACT-LENS PATIENT
    EGER, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 1979, 50 (03) : 273 - 273
  • [50] Multipurpose soft contact lens care in Japan
    Toshida, Hiroshi
    Kadota, Yoshiaki
    Suto, Chikako
    Ohta, Toshihiko
    Murakami, Akira
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 6 : 139 - 144