Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening

被引:309
|
作者
Haas, Brian M. [1 ]
Kalra, Vivek [1 ]
Geisel, Jaime [1 ]
Raghu, Madhavi [1 ]
Durand, Melissa [1 ]
Philpotts, Liane E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13130307
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare screening recall rates and cancer detection rates of tomosynthesis plus conventional digital mammography to those of conventional digital mammography alone. Materials and Methods: All patients presenting for screening mammography between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2012, at four clinical sites were reviewed in this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, for which the institutional review board granted approval and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients at sites with digital tomosynthesis were offered screening with digital mammography plus tomosynthesis. Patients at sites without tomosynthesis underwent conventional digital mammography. Recall rates were calculated and stratified according to breast density and patient age. Cancer detection rates were calculated and stratified according to the presence of a risk factor for breast cancer. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of screening method, breast density, patient age, and cancer risk on the odds of recall from screening. Results: A total of 13 158 patients presented for screening mammography; 6100 received tomosynthesis. The overall recall rate was 8.4% for patients in the tomosynthesis group and 12.0% for those in the conventional mammography group (P < .01). The addition of tomosynthesis reduced recall rates for all breast density and patient age groups, with significant differences (P < .05) found for scattered fibro-glandular, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense breasts and for patients younger than 40 years, those aged 40-49 years, those aged 50-59 years, and those aged 60-69 years. These findings persisted when multivariate logistic regression was used to control for differences in age, breast density, and elevated risk of breast cancer. The cancer detection rate was 5.7 per 1000 in patients receiving tomosynthesis versus 5.2 per 1000 in patients receiving conventional mammography alone (P = .70). Conclusion: Patients undergoing tomosynthesis plus digital mammography had significantly lower screening recall rates. The greatest reductions were for those younger than 50 years and those with dense breasts. A nonsignificant 9.5% increase in cancer detection was observed in the tomosynthesis group. (C)RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 700
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen)
    Michell, M. J.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Whelehan, P.
    Iqbal, A.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Donaldson, A. N.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Wilson, A. R. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 11
  • [42] Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Synthetic Mammography, and Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Wadera, Akshay
    Al-Ghita, Mohammed Kashif
    Al-Ghetaa, Rayeh Kashef
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Pozdnyakov, Alex
    Zha, Nanxi
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Sharifabadi, Anahita Dehmoobad
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Freitas, Vivianne
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (06): : 680 - 690
  • [43] MAMMA - Breast cancer screening: Mammography vs. digital breast tomosynthesis
    Graewert, Stephanie
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2024, 196 (02):
  • [44] Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Not All Mammography Is Equal
    Bahl, Manisha
    Lehman, Constance D.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 642 - 643
  • [45] Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening
    Kosus, Nermin
    Kosus, Aydin
    Duran, Muzeyyen
    Simavli, Serap
    Turhan, Nilgun
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (03) : 152 - 157
  • [46] Accuracy in tumor size measurements: Comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography
    Sendur, Halit Nahit
    Cerit, Mahi Nur
    Gultekin, Serap
    Cindil, Emetullah
    Aslan, Aydan Avdan
    Erdal, Zeynep Sezgi
    Gultekin, Isil Imge
    Teke, Furkan
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 69 : 115 - 119
  • [47] Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening
    Lee, Janie M.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Liao, Geraldine J.
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Kim, Adrienne E.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Rahbar, Habib
    Scheel, John R.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 119 - 125
  • [48] Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy
    Svahn, T. M.
    Chakraborty, D. P.
    Ikeda, D.
    Zackrisson, S.
    Do, Y.
    Mattsson, S.
    Andersson, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1019): : E1074 - E1082
  • [49] Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion
    Elizabeth H. Dibble
    Ana P. Lourenco
    Grayson L. Baird
    Robert C. Ward
    A. Stanley Maynard
    Martha B. Mainiero
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 3 - 10
  • [50] Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Akhtar, Amana L.
    Synnestvedt, Marie B.
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Conant, Emily F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (05) : 1143 - 1148