Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening

被引:316
|
作者
Haas, Brian M. [1 ]
Kalra, Vivek [1 ]
Geisel, Jaime [1 ]
Raghu, Madhavi [1 ]
Durand, Melissa [1 ]
Philpotts, Liane E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13130307
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare screening recall rates and cancer detection rates of tomosynthesis plus conventional digital mammography to those of conventional digital mammography alone. Materials and Methods: All patients presenting for screening mammography between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2012, at four clinical sites were reviewed in this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, for which the institutional review board granted approval and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients at sites with digital tomosynthesis were offered screening with digital mammography plus tomosynthesis. Patients at sites without tomosynthesis underwent conventional digital mammography. Recall rates were calculated and stratified according to breast density and patient age. Cancer detection rates were calculated and stratified according to the presence of a risk factor for breast cancer. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of screening method, breast density, patient age, and cancer risk on the odds of recall from screening. Results: A total of 13 158 patients presented for screening mammography; 6100 received tomosynthesis. The overall recall rate was 8.4% for patients in the tomosynthesis group and 12.0% for those in the conventional mammography group (P < .01). The addition of tomosynthesis reduced recall rates for all breast density and patient age groups, with significant differences (P < .05) found for scattered fibro-glandular, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense breasts and for patients younger than 40 years, those aged 40-49 years, those aged 50-59 years, and those aged 60-69 years. These findings persisted when multivariate logistic regression was used to control for differences in age, breast density, and elevated risk of breast cancer. The cancer detection rate was 5.7 per 1000 in patients receiving tomosynthesis versus 5.2 per 1000 in patients receiving conventional mammography alone (P = .70). Conclusion: Patients undergoing tomosynthesis plus digital mammography had significantly lower screening recall rates. The greatest reductions were for those younger than 50 years and those with dense breasts. A nonsignificant 9.5% increase in cancer detection was observed in the tomosynthesis group. (C)RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 700
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Improves Performance of Mammography Screening
    Bae, Min Sun
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (03)
  • [32] Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography
    Alsheik, Nila
    Blount, Linda
    Qiong, Qiu
    Talley, Melinda
    Pohlman, Scott
    Troeger, Kathleen
    Abbey, Genevieve
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Pollack, Erica
    Chong, Alice
    Donadio, Greg
    Behling, Michael
    Mortimer, Kathleen
    Conant, Emily
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (07) : 906 - 918
  • [33] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts
    Ha, Su Min
    Yi, Ann
    Yim, Dahae
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Lee, Eun Jae
    Lee, Soo Hyun
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Chang, Jung Min
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (04) : 274 - 283
  • [34] Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography for Detection of Breast Cancer in Kuwaiti Women
    Asbeutah, Akram M.
    Karmani, Nouralhuda
    Asbeutah, AbdulAziz A.
    Echreshzadeh, Yasmin A.
    AlMajran, Abdullah A.
    Al-Khalifah, Khalid H.
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2019, 28 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [35] A COMPARISON OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER
    Moradzadeh, A.
    Bassett, L. W.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 128 - 128
  • [36] Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ethan O. Cohen
    Rachel E. Perry
    Hilda H. Tso
    Kanchan A. Phalak
    Michele D. Lesslie
    Karen E. Gerlach
    Jia Sun
    Ashmitha Srinivasan
    Jessica W. T. Leung
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 9499 - 9510
  • [37] Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Cohen, Ethan O.
    Perry, Rachel E.
    Tso, Hilda H.
    Phalak, Kanchan A.
    Lesslie, Michele D.
    Gerlach, Karen E.
    Sun, Jia
    Srinivasan, Ashmitha
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (12) : 9499 - 9510
  • [38] Breast Cancers Detected during a Decade of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Comparison with Digital Mammography
    Philpotts, Liane Elizabeth
    Grewal, Jaskirandeep Kaur
    Horvath, Laura Jean
    Giwerc, Michelle Young
    Staib, Lawrence
    Etesami, Maryam
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 312 (03)
  • [39] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates
    Boroumand, Gilda
    Teberian, Ida
    Parker, Laurence
    Rao, Vijay M.
    Levin, David C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (05) : 1092 - 1096
  • [40] Breast tomosynthesis: A diagnostic addition to screening digital mammography
    El Bakry, Rehab Abdel Rahman
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 49 (02): : 529 - 535