Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates

被引:13
|
作者
Boroumand, Gilda [1 ,2 ]
Teberian, Ida [2 ]
Parker, Laurence [2 ]
Rao, Vijay M. [2 ]
Levin, David C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, POB 208042, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ctr Res Utilizat Imaging Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
breast cancer screening; digital breast tomosynthesis; mammography; US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations; utilization; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT; POPULATION; TRENDS; VIEWS; RATES; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18767
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. There have been many recent developments in breast imaging, including the 2009 revision of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's breast cancer screening guidelines and the approval of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for clinical use in 2011. The objective of this study is to evaluate screening mammography utilization trends among the Medicare population from 2005 to 2015 and examine the volume of DBT studies performed in 2015, the first year for which procedural billing codes for DBT are available. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed national Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary master files from 2005 to 2015, to determine the annual utilization rate of screening mammography on the basis of procedure codes used for film-screen and digital screening mammography. We also used the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary master files to determine the volume of screening and diagnostic DBT studies performed in 2015. RESULTS. The utilization rate of screening mammography per 1000 women in the Medicare fee-for-service population increased gradually every year, from 311.5 examinations in 2005 to a peak of 322.9 examinations in 2009, representing a compound annual growth rate of 0.9%. In 2010, the utilization rate abruptly decreased by 4.3% to 309.2 examinations, and it has not since recovered to pre-2010 levels. In 2015, 18.9% of screening and 16.2% of diagnostic digital mammography examinations included DBT as an add-on procedure. CONCLUSION. In contrast to the annual increase in screening mammography utilization from 2005 to 2009, an abrupt sustained decline in screening occurred beginning in 2010, coinciding with the release of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. DBT utilization was somewhat limited in 2015, occurring in conjunction with less than 20% of digital mammography examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1096
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast Cancer Screening With Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography
    Seidenwurm, David
    Rosenberg, Robert
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (16): : 1695 - 1695
  • [2] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies
    Funaro, Kimberly
    Drukteinis, Jennifer
    Falcon, Shannon
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (10) : 607 - 613
  • [3] BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING?
    Svahn, Tony
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, : 53 - 56
  • [4] Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy L.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Osteras, Bjorn H.
    Gullien, Randi
    Gur, David
    Hofvind, Solveig
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [5] Breast tomosynthesis: A diagnostic addition to screening digital mammography
    El Bakry, Rehab Abdel Rahman
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 49 (02): : 529 - 535
  • [6] Initial Experience With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening Mammography
    Philpotts, L.
    Raghu, M.
    Durand, M.
    Hooley, R.
    Vashi, R.
    Horvath, L.
    Geisel, J.
    Butler, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [7] Breast Cancer Screening via Digital Mammography, Synthetic Mammography, and Tomosynthesis
    Cohen, Ethan O.
    Weaver, Olena O.
    Tso, Hilda H.
    Gerlach, Karen E.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (03) : 470 - 472
  • [8] Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography
    Lai, Yi-Chen
    Ray, Kimberly M.
    Lee, Amie Y.
    Hayward, Jessica H.
    Freimanis, Rita I.
    Lobach, Iryna V.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [9] Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Improves Performance of Mammography Screening
    Bae, Min Sun
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (03)
  • [10] Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening
    Haas, Brian M.
    Kalra, Vivek
    Geisel, Jaime
    Raghu, Madhavi
    Durand, Melissa
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (03) : 694 - 700