Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates

被引:13
|
作者
Boroumand, Gilda [1 ,2 ]
Teberian, Ida [2 ]
Parker, Laurence [2 ]
Rao, Vijay M. [2 ]
Levin, David C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, POB 208042, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ctr Res Utilizat Imaging Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
breast cancer screening; digital breast tomosynthesis; mammography; US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations; utilization; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT; POPULATION; TRENDS; VIEWS; RATES; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18767
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. There have been many recent developments in breast imaging, including the 2009 revision of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's breast cancer screening guidelines and the approval of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for clinical use in 2011. The objective of this study is to evaluate screening mammography utilization trends among the Medicare population from 2005 to 2015 and examine the volume of DBT studies performed in 2015, the first year for which procedural billing codes for DBT are available. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed national Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary master files from 2005 to 2015, to determine the annual utilization rate of screening mammography on the basis of procedure codes used for film-screen and digital screening mammography. We also used the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary master files to determine the volume of screening and diagnostic DBT studies performed in 2015. RESULTS. The utilization rate of screening mammography per 1000 women in the Medicare fee-for-service population increased gradually every year, from 311.5 examinations in 2005 to a peak of 322.9 examinations in 2009, representing a compound annual growth rate of 0.9%. In 2010, the utilization rate abruptly decreased by 4.3% to 309.2 examinations, and it has not since recovered to pre-2010 levels. In 2015, 18.9% of screening and 16.2% of diagnostic digital mammography examinations included DBT as an add-on procedure. CONCLUSION. In contrast to the annual increase in screening mammography utilization from 2005 to 2009, an abrupt sustained decline in screening occurred beginning in 2010, coinciding with the release of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. DBT utilization was somewhat limited in 2015, occurring in conjunction with less than 20% of digital mammography examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1096
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Not All Mammography Is Equal
    Bahl, Manisha
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 642 - 643
  • [22] Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk
    Yi, Ann
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Yim, Dahae
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chang, Jung Min
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 568 - 575
  • [23] Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Singer, Tisha M.
    Jimoh, Nneka
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [24] Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Akhtar, Amana L.
    Synnestvedt, Marie B.
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Conant, Emily F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (05) : 1143 - 1148
  • [25] Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening
    Lee, Janie M.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Liao, Geraldine J.
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Kim, Adrienne E.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Rahbar, Habib
    Scheel, John R.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 119 - 125
  • [26] Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen)
    MJ Michell
    RK Wasan
    P Whelehan
    A Iqbal
    CP Lawinski
    AN Donaldson
    DR Evans
    C Peacock
    ARM Wilson
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 11 (Suppl 2)
  • [27] UTILIZATION AND COSTS OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR BREAST ULTRASOUND IN CONJUNCTION WITH FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Bonafede, M. M.
    Miller, J. D.
    Dabbous, F.
    Pohlman, S. K.
    Troeger, K. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A243 - A244
  • [28] Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen)
    Michell, M. J.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Whelehan, P.
    Iqbal, A.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Donaldson, A. N.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Wilson, A. R. M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 11
  • [29] Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography
    Poplack, Steven P.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Kogel, Christine A.
    Nagy, Helene M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (03) : 616 - 623
  • [30] Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography
    Poplack, S. P.
    Tosteson, T. D.
    Kogel, C. A.
    Nagy, H. M.
    [J]. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2008, 18 (01) : 66 - 67