Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:46
|
作者
Frey, Melissa K. [1 ,6 ]
Ahsan, Muhammad Danyal [1 ]
Bergeron, Hannah [1 ]
Lin, Jenny [1 ]
Li, Xuan [1 ]
Fowlkes, Rana K. [1 ]
Narayan, Priyanka [1 ]
Nitecki, Roni [2 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [2 ]
Moss, Haley A. [3 ]
Baltich Nelson, Becky [1 ]
Thomas, Charlene [1 ]
Christos, Paul J. [1 ]
Hamilton, Jada G. [4 ]
Chapman-Davis, Eloise [1 ]
Cantillo, Evelyn [1 ]
Holcomb, Kevin [1 ]
Kurian, Allison W. [5 ]
Lipkin, Steven [1 ]
Offit, Kenneth [4 ]
Sharaf, Ravi N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Memorial Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, 525 East 68th St,Suite J 130, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL-CANCER; BRCA MUTATION CARRIERS; BREAST-OVARIAN CANCER; LYNCH-SYNDROME; FAMILY COMMUNICATION; GENETIC INFORMATION; UPTAKE RATES; RISK; DISCLOSURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.22.00303
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSEEvidence-based guidelines recommend cascade genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer syndromes, providing relatives the opportunity for early detection and prevention of cancer. The current standard is for patients to contact and encourage relatives (patient-mediated contact) to undergo counseling and testing. Direct relative contact by the medical team or testing laboratory has shown promise but is complicated by privacy laws and lack of infrastructure. We sought to compare outcomes associated with patient-mediated and direct relative contact for hereditary cancer cascade genetic counseling and testing in the first meta-analysis on this topic.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO No.: CRD42020134276). We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating hereditary cancer cascade testing. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis.RESULTSEighty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Among relatives included in the meta-analysis, 48% (95% CI, 38 to 58) underwent cascade genetic counseling and 41% (95% CI, 34 to 48) cascade genetic testing. Compared with the patient-mediated approach, direct relative contact resulted in significantly higher uptake of genetic counseling for all relatives (63% [95% CI, 49 to 75] v 35% [95% CI, 24 to 48]) and genetic testing for first-degree relatives (62% [95% CI, 49 to 73] v 40% [95% CI, 32 to 48]). Methods of direct contact included telephone calls, letters, and e-mails; respective rates of genetic testing completion were 61% (95% CI, 51 to 70), 48% (95% CI, 37 to 59), and 48% (95% CI, 45 to 50).CONCLUSIONMost relatives at risk for hereditary cancer do not undergo cascade genetic counseling and testing, forgoing potentially life-saving medical interventions. Compared with patient-mediated contact, direct relative contact increased rates of cascade genetic counseling and testing, arguing for a shift in the care delivery paradigm, to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页码:4129 / +
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Should we consider heparin prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients? a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Abdel-Maboud
    Amr Menshawy
    Ahmed Elgebaly
    Eshak I. Bahbah
    Gehad El Ashal
    Ahmed Negida
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2021, 51 : 830 - 832
  • [32] Should we bridge the cervicothoracic junction in long cervical fusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature
    Coban, Daniel
    Faloon, Michael
    Changoor, Stuart
    Saela, Stephen
    Sahai, Nikhil
    Record, Nicole
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki
    Emami, Arash
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 37 (02) : 166 - 174
  • [33] Should we consider heparin prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients? a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdel-Maboud, Mohamed
    Menshawy, Amr
    Elgebaly, Ahmed
    Bahbah, Eshak I.
    El Ashal, Gehad
    Negida, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2021, 51 (03) : 830 - 832
  • [34] Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Panin, S. I.
    Nechay, T. V.
    Sazhin, A. V.
    Tyagunov, A. E.
    Shcherbakov, N. A.
    Bykov, A. V.
    Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu
    Yuldashev, A. G.
    Kuznetsov, A. A.
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2023, 10
  • [35] How Should We Lower Blood Pressure after Cerebral Hemorrhage? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lattanzi, Simona
    Cagnetti, Claudia
    Provinciali, Leandro
    Silvestrini, Mauro
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43 (5-6) : 207 - 213
  • [36] A systematic review and meta-analysis on performance of intelligent systems in lung cancer: Where are we?
    Sokouti, Massoud
    Sokouti, Mohsen
    Sokouti, Babak
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2020, 53 (05) : 3287 - 3298
  • [37] A systematic review and meta-analysis on performance of intelligent systems in lung cancer: Where are we?
    Massoud Sokouti
    Mohsen Sokouti
    Babak Sokouti
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2020, 53 : 3287 - 3298
  • [38] Contact allergy to metals in metalworkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alinaghi, Farzad
    Havmose, Martin
    Thyssen, Jacob P.
    Zachariae, Claus
    Johansen, Jeanne D.
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2023, 88 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [39] OUTCOMES OF CONTACT INVESTIGATION FOR TUBERCULOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Fox, G. J.
    Barry, S.
    Marks, G. B.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2012, 17 : 21 - 21
  • [40] Hereditary thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Xiaoling
    Chen, Yan
    Ye, Changxiang
    Xing, Dexiu
    Wu, Rong
    Li, Fang
    Chen, Lizhang
    Wang, Tingting
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (05) : 1213 - 1229