Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:46
|
作者
Frey, Melissa K. [1 ,6 ]
Ahsan, Muhammad Danyal [1 ]
Bergeron, Hannah [1 ]
Lin, Jenny [1 ]
Li, Xuan [1 ]
Fowlkes, Rana K. [1 ]
Narayan, Priyanka [1 ]
Nitecki, Roni [2 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [2 ]
Moss, Haley A. [3 ]
Baltich Nelson, Becky [1 ]
Thomas, Charlene [1 ]
Christos, Paul J. [1 ]
Hamilton, Jada G. [4 ]
Chapman-Davis, Eloise [1 ]
Cantillo, Evelyn [1 ]
Holcomb, Kevin [1 ]
Kurian, Allison W. [5 ]
Lipkin, Steven [1 ]
Offit, Kenneth [4 ]
Sharaf, Ravi N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Memorial Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, 525 East 68th St,Suite J 130, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL-CANCER; BRCA MUTATION CARRIERS; BREAST-OVARIAN CANCER; LYNCH-SYNDROME; FAMILY COMMUNICATION; GENETIC INFORMATION; UPTAKE RATES; RISK; DISCLOSURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.22.00303
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSEEvidence-based guidelines recommend cascade genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer syndromes, providing relatives the opportunity for early detection and prevention of cancer. The current standard is for patients to contact and encourage relatives (patient-mediated contact) to undergo counseling and testing. Direct relative contact by the medical team or testing laboratory has shown promise but is complicated by privacy laws and lack of infrastructure. We sought to compare outcomes associated with patient-mediated and direct relative contact for hereditary cancer cascade genetic counseling and testing in the first meta-analysis on this topic.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO No.: CRD42020134276). We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating hereditary cancer cascade testing. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis.RESULTSEighty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Among relatives included in the meta-analysis, 48% (95% CI, 38 to 58) underwent cascade genetic counseling and 41% (95% CI, 34 to 48) cascade genetic testing. Compared with the patient-mediated approach, direct relative contact resulted in significantly higher uptake of genetic counseling for all relatives (63% [95% CI, 49 to 75] v 35% [95% CI, 24 to 48]) and genetic testing for first-degree relatives (62% [95% CI, 49 to 73] v 40% [95% CI, 32 to 48]). Methods of direct contact included telephone calls, letters, and e-mails; respective rates of genetic testing completion were 61% (95% CI, 51 to 70), 48% (95% CI, 37 to 59), and 48% (95% CI, 45 to 50).CONCLUSIONMost relatives at risk for hereditary cancer do not undergo cascade genetic counseling and testing, forgoing potentially life-saving medical interventions. Compared with patient-mediated contact, direct relative contact increased rates of cascade genetic counseling and testing, arguing for a shift in the care delivery paradigm, to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页码:4129 / +
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fox, Gregory J.
    Barry, Simone E.
    Britton, Warwick J.
    Marks, Guy B.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 41 (01) : 140 - 156
  • [22] SHOULD WE STILL PRESCRIBE ALPHA BLOCKERS FOR URETERAL CALCULI? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Canales, Benjamin K.
    Hollingsworth, John M.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Sukamar, Shyam
    Yan, Phyllis
    Kuntz, Gretchen
    Dahm, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E717 - E718
  • [23] Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Active Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sabatino, Jolanda
    De Rosa, Salvatore
    Polimeni, Alberto
    Sorrentino, Sabato
    Indolfi, Ciro
    JACC: CARDIOONCOLOGY, 2020, 2 (03): : 428 - 440
  • [24] Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With VTE and Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Vedovati, Maria Cristina
    Germini, Federico
    Agnelli, Giancarlo
    Becattini, Cecilia
    CHEST, 2015, 147 (02) : 475 - 483
  • [25] Should social network testing be offered as an additional HIV testing approach? A GRADE systematic review and meta-analysis
    Choong, A.
    Lyu, Y. M.
    Chow, E.
    Johnson, C.
    Baggaley, R.
    Siegfried, N.
    Barr-DiChiara, M.
    Jamil, M.
    Fairley, C.
    Macdonald, V.
    Ong, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2023, 26
  • [26] Relative risk of prostate cancer for men with affected relatives: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bruner, DW
    Moore, D
    Parlanti, A
    Dorgan, J
    Engstrom, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 107 (05) : 797 - 803
  • [27] Relative Risk of Bladder and Kidney Cancer in Lynch Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nassour, Anthony-Joe
    Jain, Anika
    Hui, Nicholas
    Siopis, George
    Symons, James
    Woo, Henry
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [28] Semaglutide and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nagendra, Lakshmi
    Harish, B. G.
    Sharma, Meha
    Dutta, Deep
    DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2023, 17 (09)
  • [29] Endometriosis and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Mahamat-Saleh, Yahya
    Farland, Leslie, V
    Shigesi, Nina
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Harris, Holly R.
    Roman, Horace
    Becker, Christian M.
    As-Sanie, Sawsan
    Zondervan, Krina T.
    Horne, Andrew W.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2021, 27 (02) : 393 - 420
  • [30] Statins and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kuoppala, Jaana
    Lamminpaa, Anne
    Pukkala, Eero
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (15) : 2122 - 2132