Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Panin, S. I. [1 ]
Nechay, T. V. [2 ]
Sazhin, A. V. [2 ]
Tyagunov, A. E. [2 ]
Shcherbakov, N. A. [2 ]
Bykov, A. V. [1 ]
Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu [2 ]
Yuldashev, A. G. [2 ]
Kuznetsov, A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Volgograd State Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Volgograd, Russia
[2] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Res Inst Clin Surg, Moscow, Russia
来源
关键词
complicated diverticulitis; robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis; robotic surgery; robotic urgent surgery; diverticular disease; DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease.Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively.Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = -9 mL; 95% CI: [-26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [-0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group.Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for complicated diverticulitis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    H. E. Bolkenstein
    B. J. M. van de Wall
    E. C. J. Consten
    I. A. M. J. Broeders
    W. A. Draaisma
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 1375 - 1383
  • [2] Risk factors for complicated diverticulitis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bolkenstein, H. E.
    van de Wall, B. J. M.
    Consten, E. C. J.
    Broeders, I. A. M. J.
    Draaisma, W. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (10) : 1375 - 1383
  • [3] Should We Use Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Flexible Cystoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Carey, Michelle M.
    Zreik, Abdullah
    Fenn, Neil J.
    Chlosta, Piotr L.
    Aboumarzouk, Omar M.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (03) : 249 - 259
  • [4] Elective surgical versus conservative management of complicated diverticulitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeow, Marcus
    Syn, Nicholas
    Chong, Choon Seng
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2022, 23 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [5] Should we still use prophylactic drain in gastrectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weindelmayer, Jacopo
    Mengardo, Valentina
    Veltri, Alessandro
    Torroni, Lorena
    Zhao, Enhao
    Verlato, Giuseppe
    de Manzoni, Giovanni
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (08): : 1396 - 1403
  • [6] Perforated diverticulitis: To anastomose or not to anastomose? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shaban, F.
    Carney, K.
    McGarry, K.
    Holtham, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 58 : 11 - 21
  • [7] A systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient treatment for acute diverticulitis
    van Dijk, S. T.
    Bos, K.
    de Boer, M. G. J.
    Draaisma, W. A.
    van Enst, W. A.
    Felt, R. J. F.
    Klarenbeek, B. R.
    Otte, J. A.
    Puylaert, J. B. C. M.
    van Geloven, A. A. W.
    Boermeester, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (05) : 505 - 512
  • [8] Operative Strategies for Perforated Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Acuna, Sergio A.
    Wood, Trevor
    Chesney, Tyler R.
    Dossa, Fahima
    Wexner, Steven D.
    Quereshy, Fayez A.
    Chadi, Sami A.
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (12) : 1442 - 1453
  • [9] A systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient treatment for acute diverticulitis
    S. T. van Dijk
    K. Bos
    M. G. J. de Boer
    W. A. Draaisma
    W. A. van Enst
    R. J. F. Felt
    B. R. Klarenbeek
    J. A. Otte
    J. B. C. M. Puylaert
    A. A. W. van Geloven
    M. A. Boermeester
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 505 - 512
  • [10] Elective Resection Versus Observation After Nonoperative Management of Complicated Diverticulitis With Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lamb, M. Nicole
    Kaiser, Andreas M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (12) : 1430 - 1440