Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Panin, S. I. [1 ]
Nechay, T. V. [2 ]
Sazhin, A. V. [2 ]
Tyagunov, A. E. [2 ]
Shcherbakov, N. A. [2 ]
Bykov, A. V. [1 ]
Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu [2 ]
Yuldashev, A. G. [2 ]
Kuznetsov, A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Volgograd State Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Volgograd, Russia
[2] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Res Inst Clin Surg, Moscow, Russia
来源
关键词
complicated diverticulitis; robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis; robotic surgery; robotic urgent surgery; diverticular disease; DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease.Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively.Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = -9 mL; 95% CI: [-26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [-0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group.Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Kuen-Lin
    Lee, Ko-Chao
    Liu, Chia-Cheng
    Chen, Hong-Hwa
    Lu, Chien-Chang
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 34 (03) : 203 - 215
  • [22] Digital technologies for prediabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ng, Choon Ming
    Cheong, Wing Loong
    Chong, Chun Wie
    Teoh, Siew Li
    Yap, Wuan Shuen
    Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
    DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2025, 19 (02)
  • [23] CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO DISPARITIES IN THE USE OF ROBOTIC COLORECTAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Korous, Kevin M.
    Hayden, Dana M.
    Brooks, Ellen
    Tuuhetaufa, Fa
    King-Mullins, Erin M.
    Martin, Abigail M.
    Grimes, Chassidy
    Rogers, Charles R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S867 - S867
  • [24] The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tejedor, Patricia
    Sagias, Filippos.
    Flashman, Karen
    Li Kandala, Ngianga
    Khan, Jim
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (06) : 829 - 833
  • [25] Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates
    Gameiro, S.
    Verhaak, C. M.
    Kremer, J. A. M.
    Boivin, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2013, 19 (02) : 124 - 135
  • [26] The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patricia Tejedor
    Filippos. Sagias
    Karen Flashman
    Ngianga Li Kandala
    Jim Khan
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 829 - 833
  • [27] SHOULD WE STILL PRESCRIBE ALPHA BLOCKERS FOR URETERAL CALCULI? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Canales, Benjamin K.
    Hollingsworth, John M.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Sukamar, Shyam
    Yan, Phyllis
    Kuntz, Gretchen
    Dahm, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E717 - E718
  • [28] Hyponatremia as a predictor of complicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Huili
    Shen, Lifang
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 18 (20) : 927 - 936
  • [29] Oligohydramnios in complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rabie, N.
    Magann, E.
    Steelman, S.
    Ounpraseuth, S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 442 - U42
  • [30] Zonulin levels in complicated pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daneshvar, Mojtaba
    Yadegari, Anahita
    Ribaldone, Davide Guiseppe
    Hasanzadeh, Mohaddeseh
    Djafarian, Kurosh
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 2621 - 2628