Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Panin, S. I. [1 ]
Nechay, T. V. [2 ]
Sazhin, A. V. [2 ]
Tyagunov, A. E. [2 ]
Shcherbakov, N. A. [2 ]
Bykov, A. V. [1 ]
Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu [2 ]
Yuldashev, A. G. [2 ]
Kuznetsov, A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Volgograd State Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Volgograd, Russia
[2] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Res Inst Clin Surg, Moscow, Russia
来源
关键词
complicated diverticulitis; robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis; robotic surgery; robotic urgent surgery; diverticular disease; DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease.Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively.Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = -9 mL; 95% CI: [-26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [-0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group.Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of Acute Complicated Mastoiditis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kaufmann, Matthew R.
    Shetty, Kunal
    Camilon, P. Ryan
    Shetty, Anisha
    Levi, Jessica R.
    Devaiah, Anand K.
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (04) : 297 - 301
  • [32] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Brandao, Luis Felipe
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Laydner, Humberto
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Ouzaid, Idir
    De Sio, Marco
    Perdona, Sisto
    Stein, Robert J.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1154 - 1161
  • [33] Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis
    Tran, Elisa
    Sun, Jing
    Gundara, Justin
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (1-2) : 37 - 46
  • [34] Robotic versus Open Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jie Zhang
    Wen-Ming Wu
    Lei You
    Yu-Pei Zhao
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 1774 - 1780
  • [35] Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: Meta-analysis and systematic review
    Jackson, Nicole R.
    Yao, Lu
    Tufano, Ralph P.
    Kandil, Emad H.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (01): : 137 - 143
  • [36] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Long Peng
    Shengrong Lin
    Yong Li
    Weidong Xiao
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 3085 - 3097
  • [37] Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aboudou, Taslim
    Li, Meixuan
    Zhang, Zeliang
    Wang, Zhengfeng
    Li, Yanfei
    Feng, Lufang
    Chu, Xiajing
    Chen, Nan
    Zhou, Wence
    Yang, Kehu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [38] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Peng, Long
    Lin, Shengrong
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (08): : 3085 - 3097
  • [39] Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhengchao Zhang
    Lele Miao
    Zhijian Ren
    Yumin Li
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 2440 - 2456
  • [40] Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zhengchao
    Miao, Lele
    Ren, Zhijian
    Li, Yumin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (06): : 2440 - 2456