Comparison of Direct Digital Mammography, Computed Radiography, and Film-Screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program

被引:42
|
作者
Seradour, Brigitte [1 ]
Heid, Patrice [1 ]
Esteve, Jacques [2 ]
机构
[1] ARCADES Assoc Rech & Depistage Canc Sein Col Uter, F-13395 Marseille 10, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Lyon, France
关键词
breast cancer; breast cancer screening; breast imaging; digital mammography; film-screen mammography; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ACCURACY; DENSITY; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.12.10419
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare the performance of digital mammography using hardcopy image reading against film-screen mammography in a French national routine population-based screening program with a decentralized organization. The French context offered the opportunity to examine separately computed radiography and direct digital mammography performances in a large cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study includes 23,423 direct digital mammography, 73,320 computed radiography, and 65,514 film-screen mammography examinations performed by 123 facilities in Bouches du Rhone, France, for women 50-74 years old between 2008 and 2010. We compared abnormal mammography findings rate, cancer detection rate, and tumor characteristics among the technologies. RESULTS. Abnormal finding rates were higher for direct digital mammography (7.78% vs 6.11% for film-screen mammography and 5.34% for computed radiography), particularly in younger women and in denser breasts. Cancer detection rates were also higher for direct digital mammography (0.71% vs 0.66% for film-screen mammography and 0.55% for computed radiography). The contrast between detection rates was stronger for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast density was the main factor explaining the differences in detection rates. For direct digital mammography only, the detection rate was clearly higher in dense breasts whatever the age (odds ratio, 2.20). Except for grade, no differences were recorded concerning tumor characteristics in which the proportion of high-grade tumors was larger for direct digital mammography for invasive and in situ tumors. CONCLUSION. Direct digital mammography has a higher detection rate than film-screen mammography in dense breasts and for tumors of high grade. This latter association warrants further study to measure the impact of technology on efficacy of screening. The data indicate that computed radiography detects fewer tumors than film-screen mammography in most instances.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screen-film versus full-field digital mammography:: Comparison in breast cancer screening
    Sigfússon, BF
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (07) : 663 - 663
  • [32] Comparison of Digital Direct Readout Radiography with Conventional Film-screen Radiography for the Recognition of Pneumoconiosis in Dust-exposed Chinese Workers
    Mao, Ling
    Laney, A. Scott
    Wang, Mei Lin
    Sun, Xiwen
    Zhou, Shaowei
    Shi, Jin
    Shi, Haiyan
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2011, 53 (05) : 320 - 326
  • [33] Improved contrast-detail detection with flat-panel digital radiography: Comparison with computed radiography and a conventional film-screen system
    Erb, G
    Aretz, K
    Hahmann, M
    Radeleff, BA
    Hansmann, J
    Kauffmann, GW
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 164 - 164
  • [34] Impact of digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Initial experience in a national breast screening program
    Hambly, N.
    Phelan, N.
    Hargaden, G.
    O'Doherty, A.
    Flanagan, F.
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 55 - +
  • [35] DETECTION OF SUBTLE MICROCALCIFICATIONS - COMPARISON OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY AND SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY
    HIGASHIDA, Y
    MORIBE, N
    MORITA, K
    KATSUDA, N
    HATEMURA, M
    TAKADA, T
    TAKAHASHI, M
    YAMASHITA, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (02) : 483 - 486
  • [36] Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography:: image quality and lesion detection
    Fischmann, A
    Siegmann, KC
    Wersebe, A
    Claussen, CD
    Müller-Schimpfle, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (928): : 312 - 315
  • [37] COMPARISON OF DIGITAL LUMINESCENCE RADIOGRAPHY (DLR) AND CONVENTIONAL FILM-SCREEN SYSTEM COMBINATIONS IN SIALOGRAPHIES
    KRUG, B
    FRIEDMANN, G
    STEINBRICH, W
    LOENNECKEN, I
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1989, 150 (06): : 718 - 722
  • [38] Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, SD
    Von Heyden, H
    Bick, U
    Von Heyden, D
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Hamm, BK
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 416 - 416
  • [39] Comparison of a new full-field digital mammography system and conventional film-screen mammography: A phantom study
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Marth, F
    Le Roux, A
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 152 - 152
  • [40] Contrast-detail-resolution of full-field digital mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Grebe, S
    Marth, F
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 627 - 632