Comparison of Direct Digital Mammography, Computed Radiography, and Film-Screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program

被引:42
|
作者
Seradour, Brigitte [1 ]
Heid, Patrice [1 ]
Esteve, Jacques [2 ]
机构
[1] ARCADES Assoc Rech & Depistage Canc Sein Col Uter, F-13395 Marseille 10, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Lyon, France
关键词
breast cancer; breast cancer screening; breast imaging; digital mammography; film-screen mammography; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ACCURACY; DENSITY; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.12.10419
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare the performance of digital mammography using hardcopy image reading against film-screen mammography in a French national routine population-based screening program with a decentralized organization. The French context offered the opportunity to examine separately computed radiography and direct digital mammography performances in a large cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study includes 23,423 direct digital mammography, 73,320 computed radiography, and 65,514 film-screen mammography examinations performed by 123 facilities in Bouches du Rhone, France, for women 50-74 years old between 2008 and 2010. We compared abnormal mammography findings rate, cancer detection rate, and tumor characteristics among the technologies. RESULTS. Abnormal finding rates were higher for direct digital mammography (7.78% vs 6.11% for film-screen mammography and 5.34% for computed radiography), particularly in younger women and in denser breasts. Cancer detection rates were also higher for direct digital mammography (0.71% vs 0.66% for film-screen mammography and 0.55% for computed radiography). The contrast between detection rates was stronger for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast density was the main factor explaining the differences in detection rates. For direct digital mammography only, the detection rate was clearly higher in dense breasts whatever the age (odds ratio, 2.20). Except for grade, no differences were recorded concerning tumor characteristics in which the proportion of high-grade tumors was larger for direct digital mammography for invasive and in situ tumors. CONCLUSION. Direct digital mammography has a higher detection rate than film-screen mammography in dense breasts and for tumors of high grade. This latter association warrants further study to measure the impact of technology on efficacy of screening. The data indicate that computed radiography detects fewer tumors than film-screen mammography in most instances.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECTIVE BREAST-CANCER DETECTION WITH FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY
    SCHMITT, EL
    THREATT, BA
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 1985, 36 (04): : 304 - 307
  • [22] Computed Radiography-based Mammography with 50-μm Pixel Size: Intra-individual Comparison with Film-screen Mammography for Diagnosis of Breast Cancers
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Masuda, Norikazu
    Takechi, Kayo
    Nakayama, Takahiro
    Tatsuta, Masayuki
    Mihara, Naoki
    Takamura, Manabu
    Inoue, Yutaka
    Kuriyama, Keiko
    Kotsuma, Yoshikazu
    Furukawa, Hiroshi
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) : 836 - 841
  • [23] Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated With Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (03) : 676 - 684
  • [24] Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Film-Screen Mammography and Ultrasound in Breast Masses
    Zahid, Zeba
    Ibrahim, Zahid
    Bilal, Saira
    Farooq, Muhammad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2011, 5 (03): : 433 - 435
  • [25] Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program
    Prummel, Maegan V.
    Done, Susan J.
    Muradali, Derek
    Majpruz, Vicky
    Brown, Patrick
    Jiang, Hedy
    Shumak, Rene S.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Holloway, Claire M. B.
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 147 (02) : 389 - 399
  • [26] Clinical comparison of full breast storage phosphor digital mammography and film-screen mammography - A receiver operating characteristic study
    Freedman, M
    Artz, DS
    Hogge, JP
    Jafroudi, H
    Zuurbier, RA
    Katial, R
    Mun, SK
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 1998, 13 : 491 - 492
  • [27] Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program
    Maegan V. Prummel
    Susan J. Done
    Derek Muradali
    Vicky Majpruz
    Patrick Brown
    Hedy Jiang
    Rene S. Shumak
    Martin J. Yaffe
    Claire M. B. Holloway
    Anna M. Chiarelli
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 147 : 389 - 399
  • [28] COMPARISON OF BREAST CANCER RISK FACTORS AMONG WOMEN SCREENED BY DIGITAL AND SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY IN AN ORGANIZED SCREENING PROGRAM
    Edwards, S.
    Chiarelli, A.
    Majpruz, V.
    Cox, K-A
    Shumak, R.
    Yaffe, M.
    Done, S.
    Brown, P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 : S304 - S304
  • [29] BREAST IMAGING - A COMPARISON OF DIGITAL LUMINESCENCE RADIOGRAPHS DISPLAYED ON TV-MONITOR AND FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY
    JARLMAN, O
    BORG, A
    BRAW, M
    KEHLER, M
    LYTTKENS, K
    SAMUELSSON, L
    CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 1994, 18 (05): : 375 - 381
  • [30] COMPARISON OF COMPUTERIZED DIGITAL AND FILM-SCREEN RADIOGRAPHY - RESPONSE TO VARIATION IN IMAGING KVP
    BRODERICK, NJ
    LONG, B
    DREESEN, RG
    COHEN, MD
    CORY, DA
    KATZ, BP
    KALASINSKI, LA
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1992, 22 (05) : 346 - 349