Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program

被引:6
|
作者
Prummel, Maegan V. [1 ]
Done, Susan J. [2 ,3 ]
Muradali, Derek [1 ]
Majpruz, Vicky [1 ]
Brown, Patrick [1 ,3 ]
Jiang, Hedy [1 ]
Shumak, Rene S. [1 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [4 ]
Holloway, Claire M. B. [3 ,4 ]
Chiarelli, Anna M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Canc Care Ontario, Prevent & Canc Control, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Campbell Family Inst Breast Canc Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Digital mammography; Computed radiography; Direct radiography; Prognostic features; Stage; Tumour size; Grade; Hormone receptor status; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; TRANSITION; INTERVAL; COHORTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-014-3088-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Our previous study found cancer detection rates were equivalent for direct radiography compared to screen-film mammography, while rates for computed radiography were significantly lower. This study compares prognostic features of invasive breast cancers by type of mammography. Approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board, this study identified invasive breast cancers diagnosed among concurrent cohorts of women aged 50-74 screened by direct radiography, computed radiography, or screen-film mammography from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009. During the study period, 816,232 mammograms were performed on 668,418 women, and 3,323 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed. Of 2,642 eligible women contacted, 2,041 participated (77.3 %). The final sample size for analysis included 1,405 screen-detected and 418 interval cancers (diagnosed within 24 months of a negative screening mammogram). Polytomous logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between tumour characteristics and type of mammography, and between tumour characteristics and detection method. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were recorded. Cancers detected by computed radiography compared to screen-film mammography were significantly more likely to be lymph node positive (OR 1.94, 95 %CI 1.01-3.73) and have higher stage (II:I, OR 2.14, 95 %CI 1.11-4.13 and III/IV:I, OR 2.97, 95 %CI 1.02-8.59). Compared to screen-film mammography, significantly more cancers detected by direct radiography (OR 1.64, 95 %CI 1.12-2.38) were lymph node positive. Interval cancers had worse prognostic features compared to screen-detected cancers, irrespective of mammography type. Screening with computed radiography may lead to the detection of cancers with a less favourable stage distribution compared to screen-film mammography that may reflect a delayed diagnosis. Screening programs should re-evaluate their use of computed radiography for breast screening.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 399
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program
    Maegan V. Prummel
    Susan J. Done
    Derek Muradali
    Vicky Majpruz
    Patrick Brown
    Hedy Jiang
    Rene S. Shumak
    Martin J. Yaffe
    Claire M. B. Holloway
    Anna M. Chiarelli
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 147 : 389 - 399
  • [2] Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Performance Measures in Concurrent Cohorts within an Organized Breast Screening Program
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Edwards, Sarah A.
    Prummel, Maegan V.
    Muradali, Derek
    Majpruz, Vicky
    Done, Susan J.
    Brown, Patrick
    Shumak, Rene S.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) : 684 - 693
  • [3] Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program
    Hambly, Niamh M.
    McNicholas, Michelle M.
    Phelan, Niall
    Hargaden, Gormlaith C.
    O'Doherty, Ann
    Flanagan, Fidelma L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) : 1010 - 1018
  • [4] COMPARISON OF BREAST CANCER RISK FACTORS AMONG WOMEN SCREENED BY DIGITAL AND SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY IN AN ORGANIZED SCREENING PROGRAM
    Edwards, S.
    Chiarelli, A.
    Majpruz, V.
    Cox, K-A
    Shumak, R.
    Yaffe, M.
    Done, S.
    Brown, P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 : S304 - S304
  • [5] Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program
    Prummel, Maegan V.
    Muradali, Derek
    Shumak, Rene
    Majpruz, Vicky
    Brown, Patrick
    Jiang, Hedy
    Done, Susan J.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) : 365 - 373
  • [6] Screen-film and digital mammography in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme: a randomised design
    不详
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 4 (02): : 57 - 57
  • [7] Characteristics of tumors detected by screen-film and digital mammography during breast cancer screening
    Caleffi, Maria M.
    Bedin, Ademar M.
    Duarte Filho, Dakir L.
    de Moraes Neto, Luis Antonio
    Ferreira, Clarissa M.
    Ribelro, Rodrigo Antonini
    Rosa, Danlela Dornelles
    Wendiand, Eliana M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [8] Screen-film versus full-field digital mammography:: Comparison in breast cancer screening
    Sigfússon, BF
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (07) : 663 - 663
  • [9] Digital Mammography Is Similar to Screen-Film Mammography for Women with Personal History of Breast Cancer
    Moy, Linda
    Gao, Yiming
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2021, 300 (02) : 301 - 302
  • [10] Studies Comparing Screen-Film Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: Updated Review
    Skaane, P.
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (01) : 3 - 14