Analysis of deforestation and protected area effectiveness in Indonesia: A comparison of Bayesian spatial models

被引:72
|
作者
Brun, Cyrille [1 ,2 ]
Cook, Alex R. [3 ,4 ]
Lee, Janice Ser Huay [5 ,6 ]
Wich, Serge A. [7 ]
Koh, Lian Pin [8 ]
Carrasco, Luis R. [9 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[2] Ecole Polytech, Dept Appl Math, Palaiseau, France
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ lidalth, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Yale NUS Coll, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[5] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[6] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[7] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Nat Sci & Psychol, Res Ctr Evolutionary Psychol & Palaeoecol, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
[8] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Inst Environm, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[9] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
Conservation planning; Food security; Landscape modeling; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Spatial autoregressive models; von Thunen model; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; AUTOCORRELATION; OPPORTUNITIES; CONVERSION; EXPANSION; LOCATION; SUMATRA; EXTENT; MAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tropical deforestation in Southeast Asia is one of the leading causes of carbon emissions and reductions of biodiversity. Spatially explicit analyses of the dynamics of deforestation in Indonesia are needed to support sustainable land use planning but the value of such analyses has so far been limited by data availability and geographical scope. We use remote sensing maps of land use change from 2000 to 2010 to compare Bayesian computational models: autologistic and von Thunen spatial-autoregressive models. We use the models to analyze deforestation patterns in Indonesia and the effectiveness of protected areas. Cross-validation indicated that models had an accuracy of 70-85%. We find that the spatial pattern of deforestation is explained by transport cost, agricultural rent and history of nearby illegal logging. The effectiveness of protected areas presented mixed results. After controlling for multiple confounders, protected areas of category la, exclusively managed for biodiversity conservation, were shown to be ineffective at slowing down deforestation. Our results suggest that monitoring and prevention of road construction within protected areas, using logging concessions as buffers of protected areas and geographical prioritization of control measures in illegal logging hotspots would be more effective for conservation than reliance on protected areas alone, especially under food price increasing scenarios. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 295
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transboundary Central African Protected Area Complexes Demonstrate Varied Effectiveness in Reducing Predicted Risk of Deforestation Attributed to Small-Scale Agriculture
    Bernhard, Katie P.
    Shapiro, Aurelie C.
    d'Annunzio, Remi
    Kabuanga, Joel Masimo
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [42] Use of spatial regression models in the analysis of burnings and deforestation occurrences in forest region, Amazon, Brazil
    Camil Wadih Salame
    Joaquim Carlos Barbosa Queiroz
    Gilberto de Miranda Rocha
    Mario Miguel Amin
    Edson Paulino da Rocha
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [43] Bayesian spatial models with repeated measurements: with application to the herbaceous data analysis
    Sun, Xiaoqian
    He, Zhuoqiong
    Zhang, Jing
    Kabrick, John
    STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 18 (04): : 585 - 601
  • [44] Bayesian Influence Analysis of the Skew-Normal Spatial Autoregression Models
    Ju, Yuanyuan
    Yang, Yan
    Hu, Mingxing
    Dai, Lin
    Wu, Liucang
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [45] Bayesian spatial models with repeated measurements: with application to the herbaceous data analysis
    Xiaoqian Sun
    Zhuoqiong He
    Jing Zhang
    John Kabrick
    Statistical Methods and Applications, 2009, 18 : 585 - 601
  • [46] Semiparametric Bayesian analysis of transformation spatial mixed models for large datasets
    Wu, Ying
    Chen, Dan
    Tang, Niansheng
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2019, 12 (04) : 549 - 559
  • [47] Bayesian sensitivity analysis and model comparison for skew elliptical models
    Vidal, I.
    Iglesias, P.
    Branco, M. D.
    Arellano-Valle, R. B.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2006, 136 (10) : 3435 - 3457
  • [48] Bayesian Analysis of Skew Gaussian Spatial Models Based on Censored Data
    Tadayon, Vahid
    Khaledi, Majid Jafari
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 44 (09) : 2431 - 2441
  • [49] Comparison of Bayesian Spatiotemporal Models for Small-Area Life Expectancy: A Simulation Study
    Kim, Ikhan
    Kang, Hee-Yeon
    Khang, Young-Ho
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 192 (08) : 1396 - 1405
  • [50] Comparison of various spatial models for the analysis of cultivar trials
    Hu, Xiyuan
    Spilke, Joachim
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2009, 52 (03) : 277 - 287