Analysis of deforestation and protected area effectiveness in Indonesia: A comparison of Bayesian spatial models

被引:72
|
作者
Brun, Cyrille [1 ,2 ]
Cook, Alex R. [3 ,4 ]
Lee, Janice Ser Huay [5 ,6 ]
Wich, Serge A. [7 ]
Koh, Lian Pin [8 ]
Carrasco, Luis R. [9 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[2] Ecole Polytech, Dept Appl Math, Palaiseau, France
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ lidalth, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Yale NUS Coll, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[5] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[6] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[7] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Nat Sci & Psychol, Res Ctr Evolutionary Psychol & Palaeoecol, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
[8] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Inst Environm, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[9] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
Conservation planning; Food security; Landscape modeling; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Spatial autoregressive models; von Thunen model; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; AUTOCORRELATION; OPPORTUNITIES; CONVERSION; EXPANSION; LOCATION; SUMATRA; EXTENT; MAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tropical deforestation in Southeast Asia is one of the leading causes of carbon emissions and reductions of biodiversity. Spatially explicit analyses of the dynamics of deforestation in Indonesia are needed to support sustainable land use planning but the value of such analyses has so far been limited by data availability and geographical scope. We use remote sensing maps of land use change from 2000 to 2010 to compare Bayesian computational models: autologistic and von Thunen spatial-autoregressive models. We use the models to analyze deforestation patterns in Indonesia and the effectiveness of protected areas. Cross-validation indicated that models had an accuracy of 70-85%. We find that the spatial pattern of deforestation is explained by transport cost, agricultural rent and history of nearby illegal logging. The effectiveness of protected areas presented mixed results. After controlling for multiple confounders, protected areas of category la, exclusively managed for biodiversity conservation, were shown to be ineffective at slowing down deforestation. Our results suggest that monitoring and prevention of road construction within protected areas, using logging concessions as buffers of protected areas and geographical prioritization of control measures in illegal logging hotspots would be more effective for conservation than reliance on protected areas alone, especially under food price increasing scenarios. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 295
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Objective Bayesian Comparison of Constrained Analysis of Variance Models
    Guido Consonni
    Roberta Paroli
    Psychometrika, 2017, 82 : 589 - 609
  • [32] Sensitivity analysis of Bayesian nonparametric spatial crash frequency models
    Li, Yihua
    Gill, Gurdiljot Singh
    Cheng, Wen
    Singh, Mankirat
    Zhang, Yongping
    Kwong, Jerry
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2024, 53 (12) : 6326 - 6344
  • [33] Protected Area Effectiveness in the Scientific Literature: A Decade-Long Bibliometric Analysis
    Martinez-Vega, Javier
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, David
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [34] Bayesian temporal, spatial and spatio-temporal models of dengue in a small area with INLA
    Sani, Asrul
    Abapihi, Bahriddin
    Mukhsar
    Tosepu, Ramadhan
    Usman, Ida
    Rahman, Gusti Arviani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2023, 43 (06): : 939 - 951
  • [35] Ecological coherence of marine protected area networks: a spatial assessment using species distribution models
    Sundblad, Goran
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Sandstrom, Alfred
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2011, 48 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [36] Spatial smoothing in Bayesian models: a comparison of weights matrix specifications and their impact on inference
    Earl W. Duncan
    Nicole M. White
    Kerrie Mengersen
    International Journal of Health Geographics, 16
  • [37] Spatial autoregressive models with unknown heteroskedasticity: A comparison of Bayesian and robust GMM approach
    Dogan, Osman
    Taspinar, Suleyman
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2014, 45 : 1 - 21
  • [38] Spatial smoothing in Bayesian models: a comparison of weights matrix specifications and their impact on inference
    Duncan, Earl W.
    White, Nicole M.
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2017, 16
  • [39] Socio-economic factors boosting the effectiveness of marine protected areas: A Bayesian network analysis
    Di Cintio, Antonio
    Fernandes-Salvador, Jose Antonio
    Puntila-Dodd, Riikka
    Granado, Igor
    Niccolini, Federico
    Bulleri, Fabio
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 84
  • [40] Use of spatial regression models in the analysis of burnings and deforestation occurrences in forest region, Amazon, Brazil
    Salame, Camil Wadih
    Barbosa Queiroz, Joaquim Carlos
    Rocha, Gilberto de Miranda
    Amin, Mario Miguel
    da Rocha, Edson Paulino
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (03) : 1 - 12