Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application

被引:102
|
作者
Lancsar, Emily [1 ]
Louviere, Jordan [2 ]
Donaldson, Cam [3 ]
Currie, Gillian [4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Leonie [6 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Paediat Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Math Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Canada; Best worst discrete choice experiments; Best worst scaling; Ranking; Sequential best worst; Heterogeneity; Cardiac arrest; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MIXED LOGIT; PREFERENCES; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A key objective of discrete choice experiments is to obtain sufficient quantity of high quality choice data to estimate choice models to be used to explore various policy/clinically relevant issues. This paper focuses on a relatively new form of choice experiment, 'Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments' (BWDCEs) and their relevance to health research as a new way to meet such an objective. We explain what BWDCEs are, how and when to apply them and we present several analytical approaches to model the resulting data. We demonstrate this preference elicitation approach in an empirical application exploring preferences of 898 members of the general public in Edmonton and Calgary, Canada for treatment of cardiac arrest occurring in a public place and show the gains achieved compared to traditional analysis of first best data. We suggest that BWDCEs are a valuable way to investigate preferences in the health sector and discuss implications for task design, analysis and areas for future research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 82
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Sicsic, Jonathan
    Ryan, Mandy
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (04) : 572 - 586
  • [2] Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Watson, Verity
    Ryan, Mandy
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (12) : E1 - E16
  • [3] Data management and techniques for best-worst discrete choice experiments
    Islam, Farahnaz
    Thrasher, James F.
    Xiao, Feifei
    Moran, Robert R.
    Hardin, James W.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (04): : 1020 - 1044
  • [4] Best-worst case scaling in discrete choice experiments: An application ina rare disease population
    Lee, W. C.
    Joshi, A., V
    Pashos, C. L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A285 - A285
  • [5] For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health (vol 28, pg 572, 2019)
    Krucien, N.
    Sicsic, J.
    Ryan, M.
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (08) : 1072 - 1072
  • [6] A THINK ALOUD STUDY COMPARING THE VALIDITY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF DISCRETE CHOICE AND BEST WORST SCALING METHODS
    Whitty, J. A.
    Walker, R.
    Golenko, X.
    Ratcliffe, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A478 - A479
  • [7] A Think Aloud Study Comparing the Validity and Acceptability of Discrete Choice and Best Worst Scaling Methods
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Walker, Ruth
    Golenko, Xanthe
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [8] Estimating decision rule differences between 'best' and 'worst' choices in a sequential best worst discrete choice experiment
    Gerzinic, Nejc
    van Cranenburgh, Sander
    Cats, Oded
    Lancsar, Emily
    Chorus, Caspar
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2021, 41
  • [9] Comparing results of ranking conjoint analyses, best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiments in a nonhypothetical context
    Yangui, Ahmed
    Akaichi, Faical
    Costa-Font, Montserrat
    Maria Gil, Jose
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 63 (02) : 221 - 246
  • [10] Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Chen, Gang
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (05) : 638 - 654