Interpretation discrepancies of abdominal imaging by on-call radiology residents: Evaluation of risk factors

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Su Jeong [1 ]
Lim, Hee Joong [1 ]
Park, So Hyun [1 ]
Choi, Seung Joon [1 ]
Shim, Young Sup [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
CT; RATES; IMPACT; ERROR; MDCT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0274313
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the rate, important findings, and risk factors related to discrepancies between on-call residents' and attending radiologists' interpretations of abdominal examinations. We identified 1132 eligible patients with abdominal radiology findings that were preliminary interpreted by on-call residents between February 2016 and September 2019. The preliminary interpretations were compared with the final interpretations by abdominal attending radiologists, including clinical data. The preliminary interpretations were analyzed by three radiologists in consensus, who categorized the reports according to organs, important findings (i.e., active bleeding, bowel obstruction, organ ischemia or infarction, and organ rupture), clinical outcomes, and discrepancies with respect to final interpretations. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for important discrepant findings. Of 1132 patients, the bowel (n = 567, 50.1%) was the most common organ interpreted by on-call residents, followed by gallbladder/bile duct/pancreas (n = 139, 12.3%) and liver (n = 116, 10.2%). Of 1132, 359 patients (31.7%) had disease with 379 important findings: active bleeding (n = 222), organ rupture (n = 77), bowel obstruction (n = 52), bowel ischemia (n = 24), and organ infarction (n = 4). Sixty-four patients (5.6%) showed discrepancies, and 30 (2.6%) showed 32 important discrepant findings comprising 14 active bleeding, 10 bowel obstructions, 6 organ ruptures, and 2 cases of bowel ischemia. Of the 64 discrepant patients, 33 underwent delayed surgery (n = 18, 28.1%) or interventional treatment (n = 15, 23.4%). In multivariable analysis, bowel obstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 2.52; p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for determining discrepancy between preliminary and final interpretations. The rate of overall and important discrepancies between on-call residents' and final interpretations was low. However, given that the bowel was the most frequently interpreted organ, bowel obstruction was identified as a risk factor for discrepant interpretations. The identified risk factor and findings may be useful for residents to minimize discrepancies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of the RADPEER™ Scoring Language to Interpretation Discrepancies Between Diagnostic Radiology Residents and Faculty Radiologists
    Maloney, Ezekiel
    Lomasney, Laurie M.
    Schomer, Linda
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (04) : 264 - 269
  • [42] Comparison of interpretations of CT angiograms in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism by on-call radiology fellows and subsequently by radiology faculty
    Ginsberg, MS
    King, V
    Panicek, DM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [43] Agreement observer interpretation of head an spine CT after hours by on-call radiology resident and attending radiologist
    Triana, GA
    Angarita, M
    Bermudez, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 548 - 548
  • [44] Preparing First-Year Radiology Residents and Assessing Their Readiness for On-Call Responsibilities: Results Over 5 Years
    Ganguli, Suvranu
    Camacho, Marc
    Yam, Chun-Shan
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (02) : 534 - 539
  • [45] A systematic review of the published evaluation tools assessing residents and attendings during on-call activities
    Perreault, Francois
    Veilleux-Carpentier, Ariane
    Stapf, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2019, 14 (3_SUPPL) : 45 - 45
  • [46] Minimizing Barriers in Learning for On-Call Radiology Residents—End-to-End Web-Based Resident Feedback System
    Hailey H Choi
    Jennifer Clark
    Ann K Jay
    Ross W Filice
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2018, 31 : 117 - 123
  • [47] Minimizing Barriers in Learning for On-Call Radiology Residents-End-to-End Web-Based Resident Feedback System
    Choi, Hailey H.
    Clark, Jennifer
    Jay, Ann K.
    Filice, Ross W.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2018, 31 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [48] Residents' Performance in the Interpretation of On-Call "Triple-Rule-Out" CT Studies in Patients with Acute Chest Pain
    Garrett, K. Gabriel
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Silverman, Justin R.
    Krazinski, Aleksander W.
    Geyer, Lucas L.
    Lewis, Alex J.
    Headden, Gary F.
    Ravenel, James G.
    Suranyi, Pal
    Meinel, Felix G.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (07) : 938 - 944
  • [49] Performance of On-Call Radiology Residents in Interpreting Total Spine MRI Studies for the Detection of Spinal Cord Compression or Cauda Equina Compression
    Huang, Chi Wen C.
    Ali, Aamir
    Chang, Yu-Ming
    Bezuidenhout, Abraham Fourie
    Ivanovic, Vladimir
    Rojas, Rafael
    Bhadelia, Rafeeque A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1341 - 1347
  • [50] Accuracy of On-Call Resident's Interpretation of Total Spine MRI Performed for Evaluation of Cord Compression
    Booya, F.
    Bhadilia, R.
    Rojas, R.
    Hackney, D.
    Hochberg, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (05)