Interpretation discrepancies of abdominal imaging by on-call radiology residents: Evaluation of risk factors

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Su Jeong [1 ]
Lim, Hee Joong [1 ]
Park, So Hyun [1 ]
Choi, Seung Joon [1 ]
Shim, Young Sup [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
CT; RATES; IMPACT; ERROR; MDCT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0274313
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the rate, important findings, and risk factors related to discrepancies between on-call residents' and attending radiologists' interpretations of abdominal examinations. We identified 1132 eligible patients with abdominal radiology findings that were preliminary interpreted by on-call residents between February 2016 and September 2019. The preliminary interpretations were compared with the final interpretations by abdominal attending radiologists, including clinical data. The preliminary interpretations were analyzed by three radiologists in consensus, who categorized the reports according to organs, important findings (i.e., active bleeding, bowel obstruction, organ ischemia or infarction, and organ rupture), clinical outcomes, and discrepancies with respect to final interpretations. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for important discrepant findings. Of 1132 patients, the bowel (n = 567, 50.1%) was the most common organ interpreted by on-call residents, followed by gallbladder/bile duct/pancreas (n = 139, 12.3%) and liver (n = 116, 10.2%). Of 1132, 359 patients (31.7%) had disease with 379 important findings: active bleeding (n = 222), organ rupture (n = 77), bowel obstruction (n = 52), bowel ischemia (n = 24), and organ infarction (n = 4). Sixty-four patients (5.6%) showed discrepancies, and 30 (2.6%) showed 32 important discrepant findings comprising 14 active bleeding, 10 bowel obstructions, 6 organ ruptures, and 2 cases of bowel ischemia. Of the 64 discrepant patients, 33 underwent delayed surgery (n = 18, 28.1%) or interventional treatment (n = 15, 23.4%). In multivariable analysis, bowel obstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 2.52; p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for determining discrepancy between preliminary and final interpretations. The rate of overall and important discrepancies between on-call residents' and final interpretations was low. However, given that the bowel was the most frequently interpreted organ, bowel obstruction was identified as a risk factor for discrepant interpretations. The identified risk factor and findings may be useful for residents to minimize discrepancies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The graveyard shift: The evolution and continued experience with a nightfloat on-call system for radiology residents
    Seth, SK
    Reader, DW
    Vaswani, KK
    Mueller, CF
    Spigos, DG
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 333 - 334
  • [22] On-Call Musculoskeletal Radiographs: Discrepancy Rates Between Radiology Residents and Musculoskeletal Radiologists
    Kung, Justin W.
    Melenevsky, Yulia
    Hochman, Mary G.
    Didolkar, Manjiri M.
    Yablon, Corrie M.
    Eisenberg, Ron L.
    Wu, Jim S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (04) : 856 - 859
  • [23] Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents
    Tieng, Nelson
    Grinberg, Diana
    Li, Siu Fai
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 25 (01): : 45 - 48
  • [24] INTERPRETATION OF URETHRAL IMAGING BY UROLOGY AND RADIOLOGY RESIDENTS
    Wiegand, Lucas
    Siegel, Cary
    Brandes, Steven
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E826 - E826
  • [25] Reliability of on-call radiology residents' interpretation of 64-slice CT pulmonary angiography for the detection of pulmonary embolism: methodological error
    Sabour, Siamak
    Ghassemi, Fariba
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (04) : 427 - 427
  • [26] PACS Used While On-Call: A National Survey of Radiology Program Directors and Chief Residents
    Tesoriero, Joseph A.
    Eddy, Paul
    Hasso, Anton N.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2015, 28 (02) : 205 - 212
  • [27] PACS Used While On-Call: A National Survey of Radiology Program Directors and Chief Residents
    Joseph A. Tesoriero
    Paul Eddy
    Anton N. Hasso
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2015, 28 : 205 - 212
  • [28] Online for On Call: A Study Assessing the Use of Internet Resources Including ChatGPT among On-Call Radiology Residents in India
    Sethi, Humsheer Singh
    Mohapatra, Satya
    Mali, Chayasmita
    Dubey, Roopak
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2023, 33 (04): : 440 - 449
  • [29] Discrepancy Rates of On-Call Radiology Residents' Interpretations of CT Angiography Studies of the Neck and Circle of Willis
    Meyer, Russell E.
    Nickerson, Joshua P.
    Burbank, Heather N.
    Alsofrom, Gary F.
    Linnell, Grant J.
    Filippi, Christopher G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (02) : 527 - 532
  • [30] Discrepancy Rates of Radiology Resident Interpretations of On-Call Neuroradiology MR Imaging Studies
    Filippi, Christopher G.
    Schneider, Brett
    Burbank, Heather N.
    Alsofrom, Gary F.
    Linnell, Grant
    Ratkovits, Bela
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (03) : 972 - 979