Interpretation discrepancies of abdominal imaging by on-call radiology residents: Evaluation of risk factors

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Su Jeong [1 ]
Lim, Hee Joong [1 ]
Park, So Hyun [1 ]
Choi, Seung Joon [1 ]
Shim, Young Sup [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
CT; RATES; IMPACT; ERROR; MDCT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0274313
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the rate, important findings, and risk factors related to discrepancies between on-call residents' and attending radiologists' interpretations of abdominal examinations. We identified 1132 eligible patients with abdominal radiology findings that were preliminary interpreted by on-call residents between February 2016 and September 2019. The preliminary interpretations were compared with the final interpretations by abdominal attending radiologists, including clinical data. The preliminary interpretations were analyzed by three radiologists in consensus, who categorized the reports according to organs, important findings (i.e., active bleeding, bowel obstruction, organ ischemia or infarction, and organ rupture), clinical outcomes, and discrepancies with respect to final interpretations. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for important discrepant findings. Of 1132 patients, the bowel (n = 567, 50.1%) was the most common organ interpreted by on-call residents, followed by gallbladder/bile duct/pancreas (n = 139, 12.3%) and liver (n = 116, 10.2%). Of 1132, 359 patients (31.7%) had disease with 379 important findings: active bleeding (n = 222), organ rupture (n = 77), bowel obstruction (n = 52), bowel ischemia (n = 24), and organ infarction (n = 4). Sixty-four patients (5.6%) showed discrepancies, and 30 (2.6%) showed 32 important discrepant findings comprising 14 active bleeding, 10 bowel obstructions, 6 organ ruptures, and 2 cases of bowel ischemia. Of the 64 discrepant patients, 33 underwent delayed surgery (n = 18, 28.1%) or interventional treatment (n = 15, 23.4%). In multivariable analysis, bowel obstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 2.52; p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for determining discrepancy between preliminary and final interpretations. The rate of overall and important discrepancies between on-call residents' and final interpretations was low. However, given that the bowel was the most frequently interpreted organ, bowel obstruction was identified as a risk factor for discrepant interpretations. The identified risk factor and findings may be useful for residents to minimize discrepancies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Part I: Preparing first-year radiology residents and assessing their readiness for on-call responsibilities
    Ganguli, Suvranu
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Yam, Chun-Shan
    Appignani, Barbara
    Siewert, Bettina
    Kressel, Herbert Y.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (06) : 764 - 769
  • [32] A call to action: education of radiology residents in child abuse imaging
    Megan B. Marine
    Pediatric Radiology, 2021, 51 : 695 - 696
  • [33] Discrepancy Rates of On-Call Radiology Residents' Interpretations of CT Angiography Studies of the Neck and Circle of Willis
    Wang, Morlie L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (03) : W282 - W282
  • [34] Significant on-call misses by radiology residents interpreting computed tomographic studies: Perception versus cognition
    Funaki B.
    Szymski G.X.
    Rosenblum J.D.
    Emergency Radiology, 1997, 4 (5) : 290 - 294
  • [35] A call to action: education of radiology residents in child abuse imaging
    Marine, Megan B.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (05) : 695 - 696
  • [36] Discrepancies in interpretation of night-time emergency computed tomography scans by radiology residents
    Vaattovaara, Elias
    Nikki, Marko
    Nevalainen, Mika
    Ilmarinen, Mervi
    Tervonen, Osmo
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2018, 7 (10):
  • [37] Interobserver Agreement Between On-Call Radiology Residents and Radiology Specialists in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism using Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography
    Verweij, Johannes W.
    Hofstee, Herman M. A.
    Golding, Richard P.
    van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M.
    Smulders, Yvo M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (06) : 952 - 955
  • [38] Discrepancy Rates of On-Call Radiology Residents' Interpretations of CT Angiography Studies of the Neck and Circle of Willis Reply
    Lim, Ruth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (03) : W283 - W283
  • [39] Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents’ preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists’ final reports
    Diana Salca
    François Lersy
    Thibault Willaume
    Marie Stoessel
    Agnieszka Lefèvre
    François-Daniel Ardellier
    Caroline Nicolaï
    Abtine Nouri
    Seyyid Baloglu
    Guillaume Bierry
    Agathe Chammas
    Stéphane Kremer
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 7260 - 7269
  • [40] Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents' preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists' final reports
    Salca, Diana
    Lersy, Francois
    Willaume, Thibault
    Stoessel, Marie
    Lefevre, Agnieszka
    Ardellier, Francois-Daniel
    Nicolai, Caroline
    Nouri, Abtine
    Baloglu, Seyyid
    Bierry, Guillaume
    Chammas, Agathe
    Kremer, Stephane
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 7260 - 7269