Interpretation discrepancies of abdominal imaging by on-call radiology residents: Evaluation of risk factors

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Su Jeong [1 ]
Lim, Hee Joong [1 ]
Park, So Hyun [1 ]
Choi, Seung Joon [1 ]
Shim, Young Sup [1 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Gil Med Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
CT; RATES; IMPACT; ERROR; MDCT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0274313
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the rate, important findings, and risk factors related to discrepancies between on-call residents' and attending radiologists' interpretations of abdominal examinations. We identified 1132 eligible patients with abdominal radiology findings that were preliminary interpreted by on-call residents between February 2016 and September 2019. The preliminary interpretations were compared with the final interpretations by abdominal attending radiologists, including clinical data. The preliminary interpretations were analyzed by three radiologists in consensus, who categorized the reports according to organs, important findings (i.e., active bleeding, bowel obstruction, organ ischemia or infarction, and organ rupture), clinical outcomes, and discrepancies with respect to final interpretations. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for important discrepant findings. Of 1132 patients, the bowel (n = 567, 50.1%) was the most common organ interpreted by on-call residents, followed by gallbladder/bile duct/pancreas (n = 139, 12.3%) and liver (n = 116, 10.2%). Of 1132, 359 patients (31.7%) had disease with 379 important findings: active bleeding (n = 222), organ rupture (n = 77), bowel obstruction (n = 52), bowel ischemia (n = 24), and organ infarction (n = 4). Sixty-four patients (5.6%) showed discrepancies, and 30 (2.6%) showed 32 important discrepant findings comprising 14 active bleeding, 10 bowel obstructions, 6 organ ruptures, and 2 cases of bowel ischemia. Of the 64 discrepant patients, 33 underwent delayed surgery (n = 18, 28.1%) or interventional treatment (n = 15, 23.4%). In multivariable analysis, bowel obstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 2.52; p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for determining discrepancy between preliminary and final interpretations. The rate of overall and important discrepancies between on-call residents' and final interpretations was low. However, given that the bowel was the most frequently interpreted organ, bowel obstruction was identified as a risk factor for discrepant interpretations. The identified risk factor and findings may be useful for residents to minimize discrepancies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiology residents' on-call interpretation of chest radiographs for pneumonia
    Ojutiku, O
    Haramati, LB
    Rakoff, S
    Sprayregen, S
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (05) : 658 - 664
  • [2] Subspecialty and Imaging Modality Analysis of Cross-Sectional Interpretation Discrepancies Between On-Call Radiology Residents and Subspecialty Faculty Radiologists
    Ruma, J.
    Klein, K.
    Kazerooni, E.
    Ellis, J.
    Chong, S.
    Wesolowski, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [3] Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: The incidence of major discrepancies
    Cooper, Victoria F.
    Goodhartz, Lori A.
    Nemcek, Albert A., Jr.
    Ryu, Robert K.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (09) : 1198 - 1204
  • [4] Cross-Sectional Examination Interpretation Discrepancies Between On-Call Diagnostic Radiology Residents and Subspecialty Faculty Radiologists: Analysis by Imaging Modality and Subspecialty
    Ruma, Julie
    Klein, Katherine A.
    Chong, Suzanne
    Wesolowski, Jeffrey
    Kazerooni, Ella A.
    Ellis, James H.
    Myles, James D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (06) : 409 - 414
  • [5] Radiology residents' on-call interpretation of chest radiographs for congestive heart failure
    Feldmann, Eric J.
    Jain, Vineet R.
    Rakoff, Saul
    Haramati, Linda B.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (10) : 1264 - 1270
  • [6] The DePICTORS Study: Discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff
    Walls J.
    Hunter N.
    Brasher P.M.A.
    Ho S.G.F.
    Emergency Radiology, 2009, 16 (4) : 303 - 308
  • [7] On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity
    Mellnick, Vincent
    Raptis, Constantine
    McWilliams, Sebastian
    Picus, Daniel
    Wahl, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (10) : 1233 - 1238
  • [8] Radiology resident interpretation of on-call CT pulmonary angiograms
    Cervini, Patrick
    Bell, Chaim M.
    Roberts, Heidi C.
    Provost, Yves L.
    Chung, Tae-Bong
    Paul, Narinder S.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) : 556 - 562
  • [9] Impact of a Reading Room Coordinator on Efficiency of On-Call Radiology Residents
    Rao, Karan
    Perry, Sarah
    Hagedorn, Joshua
    Carter, Knute
    Balkenende, Brian
    Policeni, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (04) : 642 - 650
  • [10] On-call services provided by radiology residents in a university hospital environment
    Scott, JN
    Romano, CC
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2003, 54 (02): : 104 - 108