In-phantom dosimetric measurements as quality control for brachytherapy: System check and constancy check

被引:1
|
作者
Kollefrath, Michael [1 ]
Bruggmoser, Gregor [1 ]
Nanko, Norbert [1 ]
Gainey, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klin Freiburg, Klin Strahlenheilkunde, Med Phys, Freiburg, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2015年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Brachytherapy quality assurance; solid phantom measurement; afterloader system check; brachytherapy positioning-control; AAPM;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2014.11.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In brachytherapy dosimetric measurements are difficult due to the inherent dose-inhomogenieties. Typically in routine clincal practice only the nominal dose rate is determined for computer controlled afterloading systems. The region of interest lies close to the source when measuring the spatial dose distribution. In this region small errors in the postioning of the detector, and its finite size, lead to large measurement uncertainties that exacerbate the routine dosimetric control of the system in the clinic. The size of the measurement chamber, its energy dependence, and the directional dependence of the measurement apparatus are the factors which have a significant influence on dosimetry. Although ionisation chambers are relatively large, they are employed since similar chambers are commonly found on clincal brachytherapy units. The dose is determined using DIN 6800 [11] since DIN 6809-2 [12], which deals with dosimetry in brachytherapy, is antiquated and is currently in the process of revision. Further information regarding dosimetry for brachytherapy can be found in textbooks [1] and [2]. The measurements for this work were performed with a HDR (High-Dose-Rate) Ir-192 source, type mHDR V2, and a Microselectron Afterloader V2 both from Nudetron/Elekta. In this work two dosimetric procedures are presented which, despite the aforemention difficulties, should assist in performing checks of the proper operation of the system. The first is a system check that measures the dose distribution along a line and is to be performed when first bringing the afterloader into operation, or after significant changes to the system. The other is a dosimetric constancy check, which with little effort can be performed monhtly or weekly. It simultaneously verifies the positioning of the source at two positions, the functionality of the system clock and the automatic re-calculation of the source activity.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 185
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] REAL-TIME quality check of measurements of soil water status in the vadose zone
    Balzano, Brunella
    Bruno, Agostino Walter
    Denzer, Heiner
    Molan, Denis
    Tarantino, Alessandro
    Gallipoli, Domenico
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2021, 121
  • [42] Quality check of wire-mesh sensor measurements in a vertical air/water flow
    Beyer, Matthias
    Lucas, Dirk
    Kussin, Johannes
    FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2010, 21 (04) : 511 - 520
  • [44] Cost and system optimisation by electronic light control and integration of check functions
    Bilz, F
    Griessbach, R
    Mahalek, J
    ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES, 1996, 1287 : 755 - 767
  • [45] Fault-tolerant design of computer cyclic check and control system
    Hu Shaolin
    Karl, Meinke
    Rushan, Chen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 5, 2007, : 426 - +
  • [46] A Phantom for Physics QA to Check the Accuracy of an Ir-192 Stepping Source Dwell Position and Reproducibility of Dwell Time in HDR Brachytherapy
    Madebo, M.
    Pillainayagam, J.
    Kron, T.
    Franich, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [47] Training Intensity Needed for Volume Linearity and Syringe DLCO Check Quality Control
    Becker, Ellen A.
    Moran, Ellen M.
    Blonshine, Jason B.
    Rodriguez, Vanessa I.
    Blonshine, Susan B.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2025,
  • [48] Quality Control Challenges-Utilizing NetCDF files and Check Factor Data
    Thomas, J.
    Olfe, C.
    2013 OCEANS - SAN DIEGO, 2013,
  • [49] A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
    Scott, Kirsty
    Bonci, Tecla
    Alcock, Lisa
    Buckley, Ellen
    Hansen, Clint
    Gazit, Eran
    Schwickert, Lars
    Cereatti, Andrea
    Mazza, Claudia
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (24)
  • [50] Automated control of technological parameters of vacuum equipment to guarantee unbreakable quality check
    Kozov, A. N.
    Greenfield, D.
    Scherbakov, A. V.
    Filachev, A. M.
    SEVENTH SEMINAR ON PROBLEMS OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ELECTRON AND ION OPTICS, 2006, 6278