In-phantom dosimetric measurements as quality control for brachytherapy: System check and constancy check

被引:1
|
作者
Kollefrath, Michael [1 ]
Bruggmoser, Gregor [1 ]
Nanko, Norbert [1 ]
Gainey, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klin Freiburg, Klin Strahlenheilkunde, Med Phys, Freiburg, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2015年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Brachytherapy quality assurance; solid phantom measurement; afterloader system check; brachytherapy positioning-control; AAPM;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2014.11.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In brachytherapy dosimetric measurements are difficult due to the inherent dose-inhomogenieties. Typically in routine clincal practice only the nominal dose rate is determined for computer controlled afterloading systems. The region of interest lies close to the source when measuring the spatial dose distribution. In this region small errors in the postioning of the detector, and its finite size, lead to large measurement uncertainties that exacerbate the routine dosimetric control of the system in the clinic. The size of the measurement chamber, its energy dependence, and the directional dependence of the measurement apparatus are the factors which have a significant influence on dosimetry. Although ionisation chambers are relatively large, they are employed since similar chambers are commonly found on clincal brachytherapy units. The dose is determined using DIN 6800 [11] since DIN 6809-2 [12], which deals with dosimetry in brachytherapy, is antiquated and is currently in the process of revision. Further information regarding dosimetry for brachytherapy can be found in textbooks [1] and [2]. The measurements for this work were performed with a HDR (High-Dose-Rate) Ir-192 source, type mHDR V2, and a Microselectron Afterloader V2 both from Nudetron/Elekta. In this work two dosimetric procedures are presented which, despite the aforemention difficulties, should assist in performing checks of the proper operation of the system. The first is a system check that measures the dose distribution along a line and is to be performed when first bringing the afterloader into operation, or after significant changes to the system. The other is a dosimetric constancy check, which with little effort can be performed monhtly or weekly. It simultaneously verifies the positioning of the source at two positions, the functionality of the system clock and the automatic re-calculation of the source activity.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 185
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Control Pass Check Technology of Switches Based on Expert System
    Cai, Zhonghua
    An, Tingting
    Zhang, Hongtu
    INFORMATION COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, ICICA 2013, PT I, 2013, 391 : 222 - +
  • [32] Comparative Analysis and Constancy Check of Image Quality Parameters for Three Linear Accelerators Per TG 142 Protocol
    Altundal, Y.
    Pokhrel, D.
    Jiang, H.
    Badkul, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3386 - 3387
  • [33] Quality control CHECK YOUR CULTURES! Karyotyping identifies genetic instability
    Mau-Holzmann, Ulrike A.
    Osorio, Maria Joana
    Schwarz, Niklas
    Schmid, Benjamin
    MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS, 2017, 10
  • [34] A global quality control system to check PT-INR portable monitor for Antivitamin K antagonists
    Testa, S.
    Paoletti, O.
    Bassi, L.
    Dellanoce, C.
    Morandini, R.
    Lippi, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2015, 37 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [35] RESEARCH ON DIGITAL MODEL QUALITY CHECK SYSTEM BASED ON KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING
    Liu, Defang
    Li, Liying
    Zhou, Linzhen
    Wang, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2011, 10 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [36] The Quality Check system architecture for Son-Of-X-Shooter SOXS
    Landoni, Marco
    Marty, Laurent
    Young, David
    Asquini, Laura
    Smartt, Stephen
    Campana, Sergio
    Claudi, Riccardo
    Schipani, Pietro
    Aliverti, Matteo
    Battaini, Federico
    Baruffolo, Andrea
    Ben-Ami, Sagi
    Biondi, Federico
    Bianco, Andrea
    Capasso, Giulio
    Cosentino, Rosario
    D'Alessio, Francesco
    D'Avanzo, Paolo
    Genoni, Matteo
    Hershko, Ofir
    Kuncarayakti, Hanindyo
    Munari, Matteo
    Pignata, Giuliano
    Rubin, Adam
    Scuderi, Salvatore
    Vitali, Fabrizio
    Achren, Jani
    Araiza-Duran, Jose Antonio
    Arcavi, Iair
    Brucalassi, Anna
    Bruch, Rachel
    Cappellaro, Enrico
    Colapietro, Mirko
    Della Valle, Massimo
    De Pascale, Marco
    Di Benedetto, Rosario
    D'Orsi, Sergio
    Gal-Yam, Avishay
    Hernandez-Diaz, Marcos
    Kotilainen, Jari
    Causi, Gianluca Li
    Mattila, Seppo
    Oggioni, Luca
    Pariani, Giorgio
    Rappaport, Micheal
    Radhakrishnan, Kalyan
    Ricci, Davide
    Riva, Marco
    Salsanich, Bernardo
    Sanchez, Ricardo Zanmar
    SOFTWARE AND CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FOR ASTRONOMY VII, 2022, 12189
  • [37] Sensor Based Quality Check and Automated Fuel Level Indication System
    Akula, Rajani
    Sai, Bhagavatula Ramya
    Jaswitha, Kokku
    Kumar, Molugu Sanjay
    Yamini, Veeramreddy
    2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION & POWER ENGINEERING (RDCAPE), 2019, : 164 - 168
  • [38] Validation of an in-vivo proton beam range check method in an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom using dose measurements
    Bentefour, El H.
    Tang, Shikui
    Cascio, Ethan W.
    Testa, Mauro
    Samuel, Deepak
    Prieels, Damien
    Gottschalk, Bernard
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (04) : 1936 - 1947
  • [39] "Magic phantom" - a quality assurance system for high dose rate brachytherapy
    Espinoza, A.
    Petasecca, M.
    Fuduli, I.
    Howie, A.
    Corde, S.
    Bucci, J.
    Jackson, M.
    Lerch, M. L. F.
    Rosenfeld, A. B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S139 - S140
  • [40] REAL-TIME quality check of measurements of soil water status in the vadose zone
    Balzano, Brunella
    Bruno, Agostino Walter
    Denzer, Heiner
    Molan, Denis
    Tarantino, Alessandro
    Gallipoli, Domenico
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2021, 121