How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?

被引:10
|
作者
Mulhern, Brendan [1 ]
Norman, Richard [2 ]
Shah, Koonal [3 ]
Bansback, Nick [4 ]
Longworth, Louise [5 ]
Viney, Rosalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Evaluat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] PHMR, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
discrete choice experiment; EQ-5D; health state valuation; utilities; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURE; DESIGN; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X17738754
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Discrete Choice Experiments including duration (DCETTO) can be used to generate utility values for health states from measures such as EQ-5D-5L. However, methodological issues concerning the optimum way to present choice sets remain. The aim of the present study was to test a range of task presentation approaches designed to support the DCETTO completion process. Methods. Four separate presentation approaches were developed to examine different task features including dimension level highlighting, and health state severity and duration level presentation. Choice sets included 2 EQ-5D-5L states paired with 1 of 4 duration levels, and a third immediate death option. The same design, including 120 choice sets (developed using optimal methods), was employed across all approaches. The online survey was administered to a sample of the Australian population who completed 20 choice sets across 2 approaches. Conditional logit regression was used to assess model consistency, and scale parameter testing investigated poolability. Results. Overall 1,565 respondents completed the survey. Three approaches, using different dimension level highlighting techniques, produced mainly monotonic coefficients that resulted in a larger disutility as the severity level increased (excepting usual activities levels 2/3). The fourth approach, using a level indicator to present the severity levels, has slightly more non-monotonicity and produced larger ordered differences for the more severe dimension levels. Scale parameter testing suggested that the data cannot be pooled. Conclusions. The results provide information regarding how to present DCE tasks for health state valuation. The findings improve our understanding of the impact of different presentation approaches on valuation, and how DCE questions could be presented to be amenable to completion. However, it is unclear if the task presentation impacts online respondent engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 318
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification and Estimation of Discrete Choice Models with Unobserved Choice Sets
    Aguiar, Victor H.
    Kashaev, Nail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2024,
  • [32] How much is too much? An investigation of the effect of the number of choice sets, context dependence and the choice of bid vectors in choice experiments
    Carlsson F.
    Martinsson P.
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2008, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Van Godewijckstraat 30, Dordrecht, 3311 GZ, Netherlands (40) : 165 - 176
  • [33] Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments
    van der Pol, M
    Cairns, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) : 1459 - 1470
  • [34] DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS IN HEALTH ECONOMICS: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    Soekhai, V
    de Bekker-Grob, E. W.
    Ellis, A. R.
    Vass, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S325 - S325
  • [35] Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application
    Lancsar, Emily
    Louviere, Jordan
    Donaldson, Cam
    Currie, Gillian
    Burgess, Leonie
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 76 : 74 - 82
  • [36] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
    Soekhai, Vikas
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ellis, Alan R.
    Vass, Caroline M.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (02) : 201 - 226
  • [37] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
    Vikas Soekhai
    Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
    Alan R. Ellis
    Caroline M. Vass
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2019, 37 : 201 - 226
  • [38] Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: Moving forward
    Ryan, M
    Gerard, K
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, : 25 - 40
  • [39] A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist
    Ride, Jemimah
    Goranitis, Ilias
    Meng, Yan
    La Bond, Christine
    Lancsar, Emily
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2024, 42 (10) : 1161 - 1175
  • [40] VALUATION OF SF-6DV2 HEALTH STATES USING TIME TRADE-OFF AND DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT WITH DURATION APPROACHES IN CHINA
    Wu, J.
    Xie, S.
    He, X.
    Chen, G.
    Brazier, J. E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S325 - S325