How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?

被引:10
|
作者
Mulhern, Brendan [1 ]
Norman, Richard [2 ]
Shah, Koonal [3 ]
Bansback, Nick [4 ]
Longworth, Louise [5 ]
Viney, Rosalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Evaluat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] PHMR, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
discrete choice experiment; EQ-5D; health state valuation; utilities; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURE; DESIGN; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X17738754
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Discrete Choice Experiments including duration (DCETTO) can be used to generate utility values for health states from measures such as EQ-5D-5L. However, methodological issues concerning the optimum way to present choice sets remain. The aim of the present study was to test a range of task presentation approaches designed to support the DCETTO completion process. Methods. Four separate presentation approaches were developed to examine different task features including dimension level highlighting, and health state severity and duration level presentation. Choice sets included 2 EQ-5D-5L states paired with 1 of 4 duration levels, and a third immediate death option. The same design, including 120 choice sets (developed using optimal methods), was employed across all approaches. The online survey was administered to a sample of the Australian population who completed 20 choice sets across 2 approaches. Conditional logit regression was used to assess model consistency, and scale parameter testing investigated poolability. Results. Overall 1,565 respondents completed the survey. Three approaches, using different dimension level highlighting techniques, produced mainly monotonic coefficients that resulted in a larger disutility as the severity level increased (excepting usual activities levels 2/3). The fourth approach, using a level indicator to present the severity levels, has slightly more non-monotonicity and produced larger ordered differences for the more severe dimension levels. Scale parameter testing suggested that the data cannot be pooled. Conclusions. The results provide information regarding how to present DCE tasks for health state valuation. The findings improve our understanding of the impact of different presentation approaches on valuation, and how DCE questions could be presented to be amenable to completion. However, it is unclear if the task presentation impacts online respondent engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 318
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring the Loss of Consumer Choice in Mandatory Health Programmes Using Discrete Choice Experiments
    Parkinson, Bonny
    Goodall, Stephen
    Norman, Richard
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 11 (02) : 139 - 150
  • [22] Choice certainty, consistency, and monotonicity in discrete choice experiments
    Mattmann, Matteo
    Logar, Ivana
    Brouwer, Roy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2019, 8 (02) : 109 - 127
  • [23] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Rigby, Dan
    Burton, Michael
    Pluske, Jo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 65 (02): : 441 - 461
  • [24] Varying choice set sizes in discrete choice experiments
    Akinc, Deniz
    Street, Deborah J.
    Vandebroek, Martina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2024, 52
  • [25] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Dan Rigby
    Michael Burton
    Jo Pluske
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 65 : 441 - 461
  • [26] How do respondents perceive health state valuation tasks? A 'think aloud' study investigating time trade off and discrete choice experiments
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    Brazier, John E.
    Rowen, Donna
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 : 53 - 53
  • [27] One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Norman, Richard
    Street, Deborah J.
    Viney, Rosalie
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (01) : 29 - 43
  • [28] One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation
    Brendan Mulhern
    Richard Norman
    Deborah J. Street
    Rosalie Viney
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2019, 37 : 29 - 43
  • [29] Calibration and test of a discrete choice model with endogenous choice sets
    Dai, J
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1998, 30 (02) : 95 - 118
  • [30] AGGREGATION AND HETEROGENEITY OF CHOICE SETS IN DISCRETE-CHOICE MODELS
    GENC, M
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1994, 28 (01) : 11 - 22