Social impact bonds: The securitization of the homeless

被引:138
|
作者
Cooper, Christine [1 ]
Graham, Cameron [2 ]
Himick, Darlene [3 ]
机构
[1] Strathclyde Business Sch, Curran Bldg,100 Cathedral St, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Schulich Sch Business, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Telfer Sch Management, 55 Laurier Ave East, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Homelessness; Social programmes; Public sector; Not-for-profit sector; Biopolitics; Foucault; Neoliberalism; Social impact bonds; CONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aos.2016.10.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the recent phenomenon of social impact bonds (SIBs). Social impact bonds are an attempt to marketize/financialize certain contemporary, intractable "social problems", such as homelessness and criminal recidivism. SIBs rely on a vast array of accounting technologies including budgets, future cash flows, discounting, performance measurement and auditing. As such, they represent a potentially powerful and problematic use of accounting to enact government policy. This paper contains a case study of the most recent in a series of SIBs, the London Homelessness SIB, focusing on St Mungo's, a London-based charitable foundation that was one of two service providers (charities) funded by the SIB. The case study is intended to enable a critical reflection on the rationalities that underpin the SIB. For this purpose, the paper draws upon Michel Foucault's work on biopolitics and neoliberalism. The SIB is thoroughly neoliberal in that it is constructed upon an assumption that there is no such thing as a social problem, only individuals who fail. The SIB transforms all participants in the bond, except perhaps the homeless themselves, into entrepreneurs. The homeless are instead "failed entrepreneurs" who become securitized into the potential future cash flows of investors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 82
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The investor?s participation in social impact bonds
    Mazzuca, Maria
    Panzera, Elena
    Ruberto, Sabrina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 86 : 349 - 363
  • [22] Social Impact Bonds Behavioral Health Opportunities
    Trupin, Eric
    Weiss, Nicholas
    Kerns, Suzanne E. U.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2014, 168 (11) : 985 - 986
  • [23] Social Impact Bonds - Applicability In Preventive Medicine
    Moran, Roni S.
    Moran, Daniel S.
    Fire, Gil
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 228 - 229
  • [24] Towards a Theoretical Framework for Social Impact Bonds
    Albertson, Kevin
    Fox, Chris
    O'Leary, Chris
    Painter, Gary
    [J]. NONPROFIT POLICY FORUM, 2020, 11 (02)
  • [25] Social Impact Bonds: Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring
    Chamaki, Foroogh Nazari
    Jenkins, Glenn Paul
    Hashemi, Majid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 42 (04) : 289 - 297
  • [26] Impact of Supported Housing on Social Relationships Among Homeless Veterans
    O'Connell, Maria J.
    Kasprow, Wesley J.
    Rosenheck, Robert A.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2017, 68 (02) : 203 - 206
  • [27] The Governance of Social Risks: Nurturing Social Solidarity through Social Impact Bonds?
    Guter-Sandu, Andrei
    [J]. NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2021, 26 (06) : 1062 - 1077
  • [28] New development: From social impact bonds to impact bonds-an outcomes-based framework
    Buffa, Vincenzo
    Tira, Maya
    Le Pendeven, Benjamin
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 44 (01) : 80 - 84
  • [29] Social Impact Bonds und der Disput um die WohlfahrtSocial Impact Bonds and the Welfare Dispute
    Lisa Knoll
    [J]. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 2018, 70 (Suppl 1) : 117 - 138
  • [30] Social service, private gain: The political economy of social impact bonds
    Fraser, Alec
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 57 (06) : 997 - 998