Social impact bonds: The securitization of the homeless

被引:138
|
作者
Cooper, Christine [1 ]
Graham, Cameron [2 ]
Himick, Darlene [3 ]
机构
[1] Strathclyde Business Sch, Curran Bldg,100 Cathedral St, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Schulich Sch Business, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Telfer Sch Management, 55 Laurier Ave East, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Homelessness; Social programmes; Public sector; Not-for-profit sector; Biopolitics; Foucault; Neoliberalism; Social impact bonds; CONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aos.2016.10.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the recent phenomenon of social impact bonds (SIBs). Social impact bonds are an attempt to marketize/financialize certain contemporary, intractable "social problems", such as homelessness and criminal recidivism. SIBs rely on a vast array of accounting technologies including budgets, future cash flows, discounting, performance measurement and auditing. As such, they represent a potentially powerful and problematic use of accounting to enact government policy. This paper contains a case study of the most recent in a series of SIBs, the London Homelessness SIB, focusing on St Mungo's, a London-based charitable foundation that was one of two service providers (charities) funded by the SIB. The case study is intended to enable a critical reflection on the rationalities that underpin the SIB. For this purpose, the paper draws upon Michel Foucault's work on biopolitics and neoliberalism. The SIB is thoroughly neoliberal in that it is constructed upon an assumption that there is no such thing as a social problem, only individuals who fail. The SIB transforms all participants in the bond, except perhaps the homeless themselves, into entrepreneurs. The homeless are instead "failed entrepreneurs" who become securitized into the potential future cash flows of investors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 82
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social impact bonds in the UK homeless sector: perspectives of front-line link workers
    George, Thomas
    Rogers, Jim
    Roberts, Amanda
    [J]. HOUSING CARE AND SUPPORT, 2020, 23 (3-4) : 123 - 134
  • [2] Paradoxes of Social Impact Bonds
    Maier, Florentine
    Barbetta, Gian Paolo
    Godina, Franka
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 52 (07) : 1332 - 1353
  • [3] Social Impact Bonds in Australia
    Ramsay, Ian
    Tan, Corinne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING AND FINANCE LAW AND PRACTICE, 2018, 29 (03): : 248 - 257
  • [4] Securitization of disability risk via bonds and swaps
    Maegebier, Alexander Hendrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK FINANCE, 2015, 16 (04) : 407 - 424
  • [5] Effects of securitization and covered bonds on bank stability
    Arif, Ahmed
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2020, 53
  • [6] Expanding the Concept of Social Impact Bonds
    Andersen, Mikkel Munksgaard
    Dilling-Hansen, Rasmus
    Hansen, Anne Vorre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2022, 13 (03) : 390 - 407
  • [7] Widening perspectives on social impact bonds
    Tan, Stefanie
    Fraser, Alec
    McHugh, Neil
    Warner, Mildred E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY REFORM, 2021, 24 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [8] Social Impact Bonds and the Welfare Dispute
    Knoll, Lisa
    [J]. KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2018, 70 : 117 - 138
  • [9] The ethical status of social impact bonds
    Morley, Julia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY REFORM, 2021, 24 (01) : 44 - 60
  • [10] Are covered bonds different from securitization bonds? A comparative analysis of credit spreads
    Correia, Mafalda C.
    Pinto, Joao M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 29 (03) : 841 - 900