A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant

被引:36
|
作者
Henkin, Y [1 ]
Kaplan-Neeman, R
Kronenberg, J
Migirov, L
Hildesheimer, M
Muchnik, C
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Commun Disorders, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Speech & Hearing Ctr, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
Clarion cochlear implant; children; threshold (T) levels; comfortable (M) levels; dynamic range; electrode impedance;
D O I
10.1080/00016480500443391
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusions. Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIVs) in children using the Clarion cochlear implant (CI) programmed with CIS strategy stabilized after 3 months of implant use. The data presented here may be useful as a general guideline for the programming of infants and young children and may further be of help for the identification of patients who fall outside the "average'' range. Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes in electrical stimulation levels, i.e. threshold (T) levels, comfortable (M) levels, dynamic range (DR), and EIVs during the first 18 months of implant use, in children using the Clarion CI. Materials and methods. The maps of 18 pre-lingual children (mean age at implantation 4.2 years; range 1-8), using the Enhanced Bipolar 1.2 or Bipolar standard electrode with the S-Series speech processor programmed with CIS strategy, were examined at five time points: connection, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-initial stimulation. T levels, M levels, DR and EIVs were analyzed according to four cochlear segments: apical, apical-medial, medial-basal, and basal. Results. During the first 3 months of implant use T levels increased to some extent, whereas M levels and DR increased significantly. From 3 months and through the entire follow-up, T and M levels as well as DR were stable. EIVs of current carrying electrodes decreased significantly from connection to the 3-month visit; thereafter a stabilization of values was evident. Electrical stimulation levels and EIVs did not differ among the cochlear segments during the entire follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alterations in Electrode Impedance Values in Response to Electrode Stimulation in the First Mapping Session of Children Using Clarion Cochlear Implant
    Zarandy, Motasaddi Masoud
    Abbasalipour, Pavaneh
    Borghei, Hebetaidin
    Khorsandi, Muhammed Taghi
    Moubedshahi, Farzad
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2009, 5 (03): : 361 - 364
  • [2] Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant
    Henkin, Y
    Kaplan-Neeman, R
    Muchnik, C
    Kronenberg, J
    Hildesheimer, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 67 (08) : 873 - 880
  • [3] Using the CLARION® Cochlear Implant in cochlear ossification
    Bird, PA
    Butts, S
    Balkany, TJ
    Gomez, O
    Hodges, AV
    Lee, D
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 31 - 34
  • [4] Clinical trial of the CLARION® cochlear implant in children
    Osberger, MJ
    Zimmerman-Phillips, S
    Barker, M
    Geier, L
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 88 - 92
  • [5] Specific language growth in young children using the CLARION® cochlear implant
    Bollard, PM
    Chute, PM
    Popp, A
    Parisier, SC
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 119 - 123
  • [6] Electrode impedance changes over time in MED El cochlear implant children recipients: Relation to stimulation levels and behavioral measures
    Fayed, Eman Asaad
    Zaghloul, Hesham Saad
    Morgan, Ashraf Elsayed
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 21 (04) : 192 - 197
  • [7] Increase in cochlear implant electrode impedances with the use of electrical stimulation
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Adkins, Weston J.
    Olund, Amy P.
    Graham, Madison
    Patel, Neil S.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (11) : 881 - 888
  • [8] Histopathology of the Clarion Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioner in a Human Subject
    Seyyedi, M.
    Burgess, B. J.
    Eddington, D. K.
    Gantz, B. J.
    Nadol, J. B., Jr.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2013, 18 (04) : 223 - 227
  • [9] Averaged electrode voltages in users of the Clarion cochlear implant device
    Mens, LHM
    Mulder, JJS
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (04): : 370 - 375
  • [10] Language development in children implanted with the CLARION® cochlear implant
    Robbins, AM
    Bollard, PM
    Green, J
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 113 - 118