Dealing with uncertainty in sewer condition assessment: Impact on inspection programs

被引:13
|
作者
Roghani, Bardia [1 ]
Cherqui, Frederic [2 ]
Ahmadi, Mehdi [3 ]
Le Gauffre, Pascal [2 ]
Tabesh, Massoud [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] INSA Lyon, DEEP, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
[3] SINTEF, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Ctr Excellence Engn & Management Civil Infrastruc, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Asset management; Uncertainty; Sewer inspection program; Deterioration model; Condition assessment; VISUAL INSPECTION; DECISION-SUPPORT; DETERIORATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Sewer condition prediction is a fundamental element of proactive maintenance programs. The prediction relies mostly on the assessed condition of inspected segments, generally based on CCTV reports. However, several sources of uncertainty affect the condition assessment and may lead to inefficient maintenance. The present article focuses on three main questions. 1. What is the impact of uncertainty in assessed condition on the prediction model? 2. Considering uncertainties in the assessed condition, is it necessary to collect data on the characteristics of many segments, or are a small number of influential variables enough to build the condition prediction model? 3. Is it better to overestimate (false positive) or underestimate (false negative) the deterioration of a segment? These questions were evaluated on a semi-virtual asset stock and the results confirm that uncertainties affect the inspection efficiency negatively. Results also show that errors leading to the overestimation of the deterioration have less negative impact. The study suggests that data from a small number of influential segments is adequate to inform the prediction model.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:117 / 126
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review
    Simoen, Ellen
    De Roeck, Guido
    Lombaert, Geert
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 56-57 : 123 - 149
  • [32] Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Condition Assessment of Sewer Network
    Nguyen, Lam Van
    Bui, Dieu Tien
    Seidu, Razak
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 124238 - 124258
  • [33] Automated Vision Systems for Condition Assessment of Sewer and Water Pipelines
    Rayhana, Rakiba
    Jiao, Yutong
    Zaji, Amirhossein
    Liu, Zheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 18 (04) : 1861 - 1878
  • [34] From risk assessment to risk management; Dealing with uncertainty
    Courage, C
    FORESIGHT AND PRECAUTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1093 - 1096
  • [35] Simulation-Based Condition Assessment Model for Sewer Pipelines
    Hawari, Alaa
    Alkadour, Firas
    Elmasry, Mohamed
    Zayed, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2017, 31 (01)
  • [36] Inspection and condition assessment of existing timber structures
    Stepinac, Mislav
    Rajcic, Vlatka
    Barbalic, Jure
    GRADEVINAR, 2017, 69 (09): : 861 - 873
  • [37] Quantitative condition inspection and assessment of tunnel lining
    Jiang, Yujing
    Zhang, Xuepeng
    Taniguchi, Tetsuya
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 102 : 258 - 269
  • [38] Impact of sewer condition on urban flooding: an uncertainty analysis based on field observations and Monte Carlo simulations on full hydrodynamic models
    van Bijnen, M.
    Korving, H.
    Clemens, F.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 65 (12) : 2219 - 2227
  • [39] Retaining Wall Field Condition Inspection, Rating Analysis, and Condition Assessment
    Butler, Cedrick J.
    Gabr, Mohammed A.
    Rasdorf, William
    Findley, Daniel J.
    Chang, Jeffrey C.
    Hammit, Britton E.
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2016, 30 (03)
  • [40] Underground sewer pipe condition assessment based on convolutional neural networks
    Hassan, Syed Ibrahim
    Dang, L. Minh
    Mehmood, Irfan
    Im, Suhyeon
    Choi, Changho
    Kang, Jaemo
    Park, Young-Soo
    Moon, Hyeonjoon
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 106