Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review

被引:329
|
作者
Simoen, Ellen [1 ]
De Roeck, Guido [1 ]
Lombaert, Geert [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Civil Engn, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Damage assessment; Uncertainty quantification; Structural dynamics; Model updating; Bayesian inference; Fuzzy set theory; FUZZY RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL STOCHASTIC MECHANICS; BAYESIAN PROBABILISTIC APPROACH; INCOMPLETE MODAL DATA; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; CLASS SELECTION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; INFORMATION-THEORY; SPECIAL-ISSUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In structural engineering, model updating is often used for non-destructive damage assessment: by calibrating stiffness parameters of finite element models based on experimentally obtained (modal) data, structural damage can be identified, quantified and located. However, the model updating problem is an inverse problem prone to ill-posedness and ill-conditioning. This means the problem is extremely sensitive to small errors, which may potentially detract from the method's robustness and reliability. As many errors or uncertainties are present in model updating, both regarding the measurements as well as the employed numerical model, it is important to take these uncertainties suitably into account. This paper aims to provide an overview of the available approaches to this end, where two methods are treated in detail: a non-probabilistic fuzzy approach and a probabilistic Bayesian approach. These methods are both elaborated for the specific case of vibration-based finite element model updating for damage assessment purposes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 149
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Damage assessment by FE model updating using damage functions
    Teughels, A
    Maeck, J
    De Roeck, G
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2002, 80 (25) : 1869 - 1879
  • [2] Resolution and uncertainty analysis in Bayesian FE model updating applied to the damage assessment in a reinforced concrete beam
    Simoen, E.
    Reynders, E.
    Lombaert, G.
    De Roeck, G.
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 2815 - 2823
  • [3] Dealing with uncertainty in risk assessment
    Murphy, BL
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1998, 4 (03): : 685 - 699
  • [4] Risk assessment: Dealing with uncertainty
    Purchase, IFH
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 202 (1-2) : 47 - 48
  • [5] Risk assessment: dealing with uncertainty
    Davies, Gordon R. W.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2012, 36 (02): : 78 - 79
  • [6] Uncertainty-Based Damage Identification Using Cloud Model and Model Updating Techniques
    Zheng, Jinling
    Luo, Yongpeng
    Qi, Lin
    Chen, Xin
    Liao, Feiyu
    [J]. Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2024, 44 (05): : 971 - 978
  • [7] Dealing with uncertainty in model transformations
    Laghouaouta, Youness
    Laforcade, Pierre
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING (SAC'20), 2020, : 1595 - 1603
  • [8] Probability-based damage detection using model updating with efficient uncertainty propagation
    Xu, Yalan
    Qian, Yu
    Chen, Jianjun
    Song, Gangbing
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 60-61 : 958 - 970
  • [9] Damage assessment of the Z24 bridge by FE model updating
    Teughels, A
    De Roeck, G
    [J]. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 245-2 : 19 - 26
  • [10] Damage assessment of a RC frame using FE model updating technique
    Fang, Sheng-En
    Perera, Ricardo
    Huerta, Consuelo
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT, MONITORING AND IMPROVEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 726 - 732