Application of the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio to assess photoacoustic image quality

The generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) is a relatively new image quality metric designed to assess the probability of lesion detectability in ultrasound images. Although gCNR was initially demonstrated with ultrasound images, the metric is theoretically applicable to multiple types of medical images. In this paper, the applicability of gCNR to photoacoustic images is investigated. The gCNR was computed for both simulated and experimental photoacoustic images generated by amplitude-based (i.e., delay-and-sum) and coherence-based (i.e., short-lag spatial coherence) beamformers. These gCNR measurements were compared to three more traditional image quality metrics (i.e., contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio) applied to the same datasets. An increase in qualitative target visibility generally corresponded with increased gCNR. In addition, gCNR magnitude was more directly related to the separability of photoacoustic signals from their background, which degraded with the presence of limited bandwidth artifacts and increased levels of channel noise. At high gCNR values (i.e., 0.95-1), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio varied by up to 23.7-56.2 dB, 2.0-3.4, and 26.5-7.6x10(20), respectively, for simulated, experimental phantom, and in vivo data. Therefore, these traditional metrics can experience large variations when a target is fully detectable, and additional increases in these values would have no impact on photoacoustic target detectability. In addition, gCNR is robust to changes in traditional metrics introduced by applying a minimum threshold to image amplitudes. In tandem with other photoacoustic image quality metrics and with a defined range of 0 to 1, gCNR has promising potential to provide additional insight, particularly when designing new beamformers and image formation techniques and when reporting quantitative performance without an opportunity to qualitatively assess corresponding images (e.g., in text-only abstracts). (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement