Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies

被引:41
|
作者
Sah, Bert-Ram [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Stolzmann, Paul [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Delso, Gaspar [1 ,5 ]
Wollenweber, Scott D. [5 ]
Huellner, Martin [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hakami, Yahya A. [1 ]
Queiroz, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Barbosa, Felipe de Galiza [1 ,4 ]
von Schulthess, Gustav K. [1 ,4 ]
Pietsch, Carsten [1 ,4 ]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] GE Healthcare, PET Clin Sci, Waukesha, WI USA
关键词
image reconstruction; penalized likelihood; PET; reconstruction algorithm; TIME-OF-FLIGHT; PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD RECONSTRUCTION; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUES; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ORDERED SUBSETS; LESION DETECTION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000604
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the clinical performance of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in oncologic PET/computed tomography (CT) studies.MethodsA total of 410 reconstructions of 41 fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT studies of 41 patients with a total of 2010 lesions were analyzed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Images were reconstructed with BSREM (with four different values) or ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with/without time-of-flight (TOF/non-TOF) corrections. OSEM reconstruction postfiltering was 4.0mm full-width at half-maximum; BSREM did not use postfiltering. Evaluation of general image quality was performed with a five-point scale using maximum intensity projections. Artifacts (category 1), image sharpness (category 2), noise (category 3), and lesion detectability (category 4) were analyzed using a four-point scale. Size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesions were measured by a third reader not involved in the image evaluation.ResultsBSREM-TOF reconstructions showed the best results in all categories, independent of different body compartments. In all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstructions were significantly better than OSEM non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001). In almost all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstruction was comparable to or better than the OSEM-TOF algorithm (P<0.001 for general image quality, image sharpness, noise, and P=1.0 for artifact). Only in lesion detectability was OSEM-TOF significantly better than BSREM non-TOF (P<0.001). Both BSREM-TOF and BSREM non-TOF showed a decreasing SUVmax with increasing values (P<0.001) and TOF reconstructions showed a significantly higher SUVmax than non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001).ConclusionThe BSREM reconstruction algorithm showed a relevant improvement compared with OSEM reconstruction in PET/CT studies in all evaluated categories. BSREM might be used in clinical routine in conjunction with TOF to achieve better/higher image quality and lesion detectability or in PET/CT-systems without TOF-capability for enhancement of overall image quality as well.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of 18F-FDG PET or 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules
    Li, Wenbo
    Pang, Hua
    Liu, Qiong
    Zhou, Jing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (10) : 2032 - 2037
  • [42] The study of 18F-FDG and 18F-FCH PET/CT in the clinical evaluation of pancreatic cancer
    Cheng, Bing
    Han, Xingmin
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59
  • [43] Preliminary Study of Heterogenous Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluation of PCNSL: Comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Zhou, Wenlan
    Feng, Jie
    Ren, Yunyan
    Wang, Quanshi
    Wu, Hubing
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59
  • [44] 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response
    Ben-Haim, Simona
    Ell, Peter
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (01) : 88 - 99
  • [45] 18F-FDG PET/CT in Angiosarcoma
    Kuo, W.
    Lin, C.
    Yen, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 : S476 - S476
  • [46] Value of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for Evaluation of Pediatric Malignancies
    Uslu, Lebriz
    Donig, Jessica
    Link, Michael
    Rosenberg, Jarrett
    Quon, Andrew
    Daldrup-Link, Heike E.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (02) : 274 - 286
  • [47] Momentum acceleration of the block sequential regularized expectation maximization algorithm as applied to General Electric's Q.Clear PET image reconstruction algorithm
    Schmidtlein, C.
    Guo, J.
    Lin, Y.
    Krol, A.
    Li, S.
    Ahn, S.
    Stearns, C.
    Xu, Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (SUPPL 1) : S60 - S60
  • [48] The Performance of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detection of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
    Dong, M.
    Zhao, K.
    Zhao, J.
    Guan, Y.
    Liu, Z.
    Ruan, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S275 - S275
  • [49] 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Assessing Response to Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Krause, Bernd J.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Wieder, Hinrich
    zum Bueschenfelde, Christian Meyer
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 : 89S - 96S
  • [50] 18F-FDG PET/MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma
    Wang, Hao
    Zhao, Xiaobin
    Zang, Jie
    Zhu, Zhaohui
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59