共 50 条
Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies
被引:41
|作者:
Sah, Bert-Ram
[1
,2
,4
]
Stolzmann, Paul
[1
,3
,4
]
Delso, Gaspar
[1
,5
]
Wollenweber, Scott D.
[5
]
Huellner, Martin
[1
,3
,4
]
Hakami, Yahya A.
[1
]
Queiroz, Marcelo A.
[1
]
Barbosa, Felipe de Galiza
[1
,4
]
von Schulthess, Gustav K.
[1
,4
]
Pietsch, Carsten
[1
,4
]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] GE Healthcare, PET Clin Sci, Waukesha, WI USA
关键词:
image reconstruction;
penalized likelihood;
PET;
reconstruction algorithm;
TIME-OF-FLIGHT;
PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD RECONSTRUCTION;
STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUES;
ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION;
IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION;
EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
ORDERED SUBSETS;
LESION DETECTION;
IMPACT;
PERFORMANCE;
D O I:
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000604
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
PurposeTo investigate the clinical performance of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in oncologic PET/computed tomography (CT) studies.MethodsA total of 410 reconstructions of 41 fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT studies of 41 patients with a total of 2010 lesions were analyzed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Images were reconstructed with BSREM (with four different values) or ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with/without time-of-flight (TOF/non-TOF) corrections. OSEM reconstruction postfiltering was 4.0mm full-width at half-maximum; BSREM did not use postfiltering. Evaluation of general image quality was performed with a five-point scale using maximum intensity projections. Artifacts (category 1), image sharpness (category 2), noise (category 3), and lesion detectability (category 4) were analyzed using a four-point scale. Size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesions were measured by a third reader not involved in the image evaluation.ResultsBSREM-TOF reconstructions showed the best results in all categories, independent of different body compartments. In all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstructions were significantly better than OSEM non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001). In almost all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstruction was comparable to or better than the OSEM-TOF algorithm (P<0.001 for general image quality, image sharpness, noise, and P=1.0 for artifact). Only in lesion detectability was OSEM-TOF significantly better than BSREM non-TOF (P<0.001). Both BSREM-TOF and BSREM non-TOF showed a decreasing SUVmax with increasing values (P<0.001) and TOF reconstructions showed a significantly higher SUVmax than non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001).ConclusionThe BSREM reconstruction algorithm showed a relevant improvement compared with OSEM reconstruction in PET/CT studies in all evaluated categories. BSREM might be used in clinical routine in conjunction with TOF to achieve better/higher image quality and lesion detectability or in PET/CT-systems without TOF-capability for enhancement of overall image quality as well.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文