Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies

被引:41
|
作者
Sah, Bert-Ram [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Stolzmann, Paul [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Delso, Gaspar [1 ,5 ]
Wollenweber, Scott D. [5 ]
Huellner, Martin [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hakami, Yahya A. [1 ]
Queiroz, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Barbosa, Felipe de Galiza [1 ,4 ]
von Schulthess, Gustav K. [1 ,4 ]
Pietsch, Carsten [1 ,4 ]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] GE Healthcare, PET Clin Sci, Waukesha, WI USA
关键词
image reconstruction; penalized likelihood; PET; reconstruction algorithm; TIME-OF-FLIGHT; PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD RECONSTRUCTION; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUES; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ORDERED SUBSETS; LESION DETECTION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000604
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the clinical performance of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in oncologic PET/computed tomography (CT) studies.MethodsA total of 410 reconstructions of 41 fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT studies of 41 patients with a total of 2010 lesions were analyzed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Images were reconstructed with BSREM (with four different values) or ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with/without time-of-flight (TOF/non-TOF) corrections. OSEM reconstruction postfiltering was 4.0mm full-width at half-maximum; BSREM did not use postfiltering. Evaluation of general image quality was performed with a five-point scale using maximum intensity projections. Artifacts (category 1), image sharpness (category 2), noise (category 3), and lesion detectability (category 4) were analyzed using a four-point scale. Size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesions were measured by a third reader not involved in the image evaluation.ResultsBSREM-TOF reconstructions showed the best results in all categories, independent of different body compartments. In all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstructions were significantly better than OSEM non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001). In almost all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstruction was comparable to or better than the OSEM-TOF algorithm (P<0.001 for general image quality, image sharpness, noise, and P=1.0 for artifact). Only in lesion detectability was OSEM-TOF significantly better than BSREM non-TOF (P<0.001). Both BSREM-TOF and BSREM non-TOF showed a decreasing SUVmax with increasing values (P<0.001) and TOF reconstructions showed a significantly higher SUVmax than non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001).ConclusionThe BSREM reconstruction algorithm showed a relevant improvement compared with OSEM reconstruction in PET/CT studies in all evaluated categories. BSREM might be used in clinical routine in conjunction with TOF to achieve better/higher image quality and lesion detectability or in PET/CT-systems without TOF-capability for enhancement of overall image quality as well.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the Significance of Defective Block Detectors in Clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging
    Esmat Elhami
    Maryam Samiee
    Sandor Demeter
    William D. Leslie
    Andrew L. Goertzen
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2011, 13 : 265 - 274
  • [22] On the Significance of Defective Block Detectors in Clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging
    Elhami, Esmat
    Samiee, Maryam
    Demeter, Sandor
    Leslie, William D.
    Goertzen, Andrew L.
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 13 (02) : 265 - 274
  • [23] Clinical evaluation of reconstruction and acquisition time for pediatric 18F-FDG brain PET using digital PET/CT
    Nicholas A. Shkumat
    Reza Vali
    Amer Shammas
    Pediatric Radiology, 2020, 50 : 966 - 972
  • [24] Clinical evaluation of reconstruction and acquisition time for pediatric 18F-FDG brain PET using digital PET/CT
    Shkumat, Nicholas A.
    Vali, Reza
    Shammas, Amer
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 50 (07) : 966 - 972
  • [25] Evaluation of Quantitative Whole Body Dynamic FDG-PET Using Block Sequence Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) Reconstruction
    Kaeck, Alexander
    Hurley, Samuel
    Bradshaw, Tyler
    Perlman, Scott
    Cho, Steve
    McMillan, Alan
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60
  • [26] Evaluation of mebeverine effect in 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Song, Ho June
    Seo, Hyo Jung
    Lee, Hong Jae
    Lee, Soo Jin
    Kang, Keon Wook
    Lee, Jae Sung
    Kim, Jin Eui
    Lee, Dong Soo
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [27] Evaluation of penile cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Seitz, M
    Schlenker, B
    Scher, B
    Gratzke, C
    Oliver, R
    Stief, CG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 194 - 195
  • [28] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of adrenal masses
    Metser, U
    Miller, E
    Lerman, H
    Lievshitz, G
    Avital, S
    Even-Sapir, E
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2006, 47 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [29] Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: evaluation by 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Lima, Livia Maria Frota
    Packard, Annie T.
    Broski, Stephen M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 11 (02): : 77 - 86
  • [30] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Polyarteritis Nodosa
    Brown, Parker J.
    Huang, Steve
    Martinez, Felipe
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (12) : E682 - E684