Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies

被引:41
|
作者
Sah, Bert-Ram [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Stolzmann, Paul [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Delso, Gaspar [1 ,5 ]
Wollenweber, Scott D. [5 ]
Huellner, Martin [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hakami, Yahya A. [1 ]
Queiroz, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Barbosa, Felipe de Galiza [1 ,4 ]
von Schulthess, Gustav K. [1 ,4 ]
Pietsch, Carsten [1 ,4 ]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] GE Healthcare, PET Clin Sci, Waukesha, WI USA
关键词
image reconstruction; penalized likelihood; PET; reconstruction algorithm; TIME-OF-FLIGHT; PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD RECONSTRUCTION; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUES; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ORDERED SUBSETS; LESION DETECTION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000604
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the clinical performance of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in oncologic PET/computed tomography (CT) studies.MethodsA total of 410 reconstructions of 41 fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT studies of 41 patients with a total of 2010 lesions were analyzed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Images were reconstructed with BSREM (with four different values) or ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with/without time-of-flight (TOF/non-TOF) corrections. OSEM reconstruction postfiltering was 4.0mm full-width at half-maximum; BSREM did not use postfiltering. Evaluation of general image quality was performed with a five-point scale using maximum intensity projections. Artifacts (category 1), image sharpness (category 2), noise (category 3), and lesion detectability (category 4) were analyzed using a four-point scale. Size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesions were measured by a third reader not involved in the image evaluation.ResultsBSREM-TOF reconstructions showed the best results in all categories, independent of different body compartments. In all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstructions were significantly better than OSEM non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001). In almost all categories, BSREM non-TOF reconstruction was comparable to or better than the OSEM-TOF algorithm (P<0.001 for general image quality, image sharpness, noise, and P=1.0 for artifact). Only in lesion detectability was OSEM-TOF significantly better than BSREM non-TOF (P<0.001). Both BSREM-TOF and BSREM non-TOF showed a decreasing SUVmax with increasing values (P<0.001) and TOF reconstructions showed a significantly higher SUVmax than non-TOF reconstructions (P<0.001).ConclusionThe BSREM reconstruction algorithm showed a relevant improvement compared with OSEM reconstruction in PET/CT studies in all evaluated categories. BSREM might be used in clinical routine in conjunction with TOF to achieve better/higher image quality and lesion detectability or in PET/CT-systems without TOF-capability for enhancement of overall image quality as well.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of POEMS syndrome
    Alberti, M. A.
    Martinez-Yelamos, S.
    Fernandez, A.
    Vidaller, A.
    Narvaez, J. A.
    Cano, L. M.
    Gamez, C.
    Martinez-Matos, J. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (02) : 180 - 182
  • [32] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of parotideal masses
    Castellucci, P
    Nanni, C
    Farsad, M
    Savastio, G
    Schiavon, P
    Neri, G
    Scarale, N
    Levorato, M
    Gavaruzzi, G
    Zagni, P
    Monetti, N
    Fanti, S
    Franchi, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 : S224 - S224
  • [33] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of ovarian carcinoma
    Rusu, G.
    Olariu, E.
    Alexiev, A.
    Hitu, L.
    Spinu, E.
    Gabora, K.
    Achimas-Cadariu, P.
    Piciu, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S475 - S476
  • [34] Clinical use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Norway
    Bogsrud, K. P.
    Saeves, M.
    Cappelen, T.
    Revheim, M.
    Bach-Gansmo, T.
    Bjering, K.
    Bogsrud, T. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S249 - S249
  • [35] Evaluation of mebeverine effect in 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Song, Ho June
    Seo, Hyo Jung
    Lee, Hong Jae
    Lee, Soo Jin
    Kang, Keon Wook
    Lee, Jae Sung
    Kim, Jin Eui
    Lee, Dong Soo
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [36] Galactocele, Pitfall for the Evaluation by 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Ceyrat, Quentin
    Ziade, Caroline
    Tlili, Ghoufrane
    Fernandez, Philippe
    Meyer, Marie
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (07) : E237 - E238
  • [37] Evaluation of 18F-FDG uptake and arterial wall calcifications using 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Ben-Haim, S
    Kupzov, E
    Tamir, A
    Israel, O
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2004, 45 (11) : 1816 - 1821
  • [38] Optimizing the Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) Algorithm for 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT Imaging: Phantom and Clinical Study
    Sadeghi, F.
    Sheikhzadeh, P.
    Kasraie, N.
    Farzanehfar, S.
    Abbasi, M.
    Salehi, Y.
    Ay, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (SUPPL 1) : S714 - S714
  • [39] Clinical evaluation of interstitial lung disease using 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Matsumoto, Masataka
    Morikawa, Maho
    Yamazaki, Shun
    Ito, Saki
    Katsurada, Masahiro
    Kono, Yuko
    Takatsuki, Kiyonobu
    Nishimura, Yoshihiro
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2024, 64
  • [40] Clinical Usefulness Of 18F-FDG PET/CT For The Evaluation Of The Atypical Adrenal Tumors
    Rubio Rodriguez, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S763 - S763