Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality

被引:34
|
作者
Bermann, Matias [1 ]
Legarra, Andres [2 ]
Hollifield, Mary Kate [1 ]
Masuda, Yutaka [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [1 ]
Misztal, Ignacy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] INRA Toulouse, UMR GenPhySE, Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
accuracy; binary trait; categorical trait; validation of genomic models; GENETIC EVALUATION; DAIRY-CATTLE; INFORMATION; SELECTION; VARIANCE; FEMALES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12507
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine whether the linear regression (LR) method could be used to validate genomic threshold models. Statistics for the LR method were computed from estimated breeding values (EBVs) using the whole and truncated data sets with variances from the reference and validation populations. The method was tested using simulated and real chicken data sets. The simulated data set included 10 generations of 4,500 birds each; genotypes were available for the last three generations. Each animal was assigned a continuous trait, which was converted to a binary score assuming an incidence of failure of 7%. The real data set included the survival status of 186,596 broilers (mortality rate equal to 7.2%) and genotypes of 18,047 birds. Both data sets were analysed using best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) or single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The whole data set included all phenotypes available, whereas in the partial data set, phenotypes of the most recent generation were removed. In the simulated data set, the accuracies based on the LR formulas were 0.45 for BLUP and 0.76 for ssGBLUP, whereas the correlations between true breeding values and EBVs (i.e. true accuracies) were 0.37 and 0.65, respectively. The gain in accuracy by adding genomic information was overestimated by 0.09 when using the LR method compared to the true increase in accuracy. However, when the estimated ratio between the additive variance computed based on pedigree only and on pedigree and genomic information was considered, the difference between true and estimated gain was <0.02. Accuracies of BLUP and ssGBLUP with the real data set were 0.41 and 0.47, respectively. This small improvement in accuracy when using ssGBLUP with the real data set was due to population structure and lower heritability. The LR method is a useful tool for estimating improvements in accuracy of EBVs due to the inclusion of genomic information when traditional validation methods ask-fold validation and predictive ability are not applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: an application in chicken mortality
    Bermann, Matias
    Legarra, Andres
    Hollifield, Mary Kate
    Masuda, Yutaka
    Lourenco, Daniela
    Misztal, Ignacy
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 246 - 247
  • [2] Validation of single-step genomic predictions using the linear regression method for milk yield and heat tolerance in a Thai-Holstein population
    Sungkhapreecha, Piriyaporn
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Hidalgo, Jorge
    Lourenco, Daniela
    Buaban, Sayan
    Chankitisakul, Vibuntita
    Boonkum, Wuttigrai
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2021, 14 (12) : 3119 - 3125
  • [3] Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP
    Londono-Gil, Marisol
    Lopez-Correa, Rodrigo
    Aguilar, Ignacio
    Magnabosco, Claudio Ulhoa
    Hidalgo, Jorge
    Bussiman, Fernando
    Baldi, Fernando
    Lourenco, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2025, 142 (01) : 43 - 56
  • [4] An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular
    Rohan L. Fernando
    Hao Cheng
    Dorian J. Garrick
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 48
  • [5] An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular
    Fernando, Rohan L.
    Cheng, Hao
    Garrick, Dorian J.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2016, 48 : 1 - 12
  • [6] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Gao, Hongding
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Madsen, Per
    Nielsen, Ulrik S.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Lund, Mogens S.
    Su, Guosheng
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44
  • [7] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Hongding Gao
    Ole F Christensen
    Per Madsen
    Ulrik S Nielsen
    Yuan Zhang
    Mogens S Lund
    Guosheng Su
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 44
  • [8] Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP
    Andre Garcia
    Ignacio Aguilar
    Andres Legarra
    Shogo Tsuruta
    Ignacy Misztal
    Daniela Lourenco
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 54
  • [9] Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP
    Garcia, Andre
    Aguilar, Ignacio
    Legarra, Andres
    Tsuruta, Shogo
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [10] Correction: Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP
    Andre Garcia
    Ignacio Aguilar
    Andres Legarra
    Shogo Tsuruta
    Ignacy Misztal
    Daniela Lourenco
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 55