Influence of Ocular Stiffness on Intraocular Pressure Estimation Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

被引:0
|
作者
Shirane, Masako [1 ]
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Otani, Keiko [2 ]
Kurita, Yuichi [3 ]
Kaneko, Makoto [4 ]
Takenaka, Joji [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Res Inst Radiat Biol & Med, Dept Environmetr & Biometr, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Engn, Hiroshima 7398527, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Ocular stiffness; Intraocular pressure estimation; Goldmann applanation tonometry; High-resolution camera; Glaucoma; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; CORNEAL THICKNESS; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RESPONSE ANALYZER; CURVATURE; GLAUCOMA; MODULUS; TENSION; NONCONTACT; ELASTICITY;
D O I
10.5405/jmbe.1381
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is important for management of glaucoma. Ocular stiffness is considered to be an important biomechanical factor influencing corneal deformation during TOP measurements by a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). The purpose of this study was to investigate how ocular stiffness is related to clinical parameters. Ocular stiffness was defined as the ratio between the change in the force applied to the cornea and the resultant displacement of the corneal apex. Fifty-nine Japanese subjects had their ocular stiffness measured. A GAT was used to apply pressure to the cornea and a high-resolution camera was used to measure corneal apex displacement by photographing the cornea in profile. Multiple regression analyses were used to assess how ocular stiffness is associated with seven factors: TOP measured by the GAT (IOPGAT), radius of curvature of the cornea (R), ocular axial length, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, age, and gender. Ocular stiffness was found to be proportional to the product of (IOPGAT)(0.66) and (R)(0.92); the other factors were not significantly associated with ocular stiffness. For an individual eye, because the value of the radius of corneal curvature was unchanged, ocular stiffness was proportional to (IOPGAT)(0.66). This means that the rate at which ocular stiffness diminishes is greater in the lower, compared to the higher, IOPGAT range. Hence, the rate at which the true TOP diminishes is greater in the lower IOPGAT range because the true IOP is considered to be the primary factor influencing ocular stiffness. This suggests that, in patients with lower IOPGAT, the change of true IOP should become progressively greater than the value indicated by IOPGAT. This result allows improved evaluation of treatment effectiveness in normal-tension glaucoma patients.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 299
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure After DSAEK: comparison of Dynamic Contour tonometry with Goldmann Applanation tonometry
    Borges, Barbara
    Vicente, Andre
    Anjos, Rita
    Vieira, Luisa
    Santos, Arnaldo Dias
    Ferreira, Joana
    Maduro, Vitor
    Alves, Nuno
    Feijao, Joao
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [32] Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
    Shemesh, Gabi
    Soiberman, Uri
    Kurtz, Shimon
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 6 : 1967 - 1970
  • [33] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2022, 119 (SUPPL 1): : 71 - 76
  • [34] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 2022, 119 : S71 - S76
  • [35] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    Hsu, S-Y
    Sheu, M-M
    Hsu, A-H
    Wu, K-Y
    Yeh, J-I
    Tien, J-N
    Tsai, R-K
    EYE, 2009, 23 (07) : 1582 - 1588
  • [36] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    S-Y Hsu
    M-M Sheu
    A-H Hsu
    K-Y Wu
    J-I Yeh
    J-N Tien
    R-K Tsai
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 1582 - 1588
  • [37] Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
    Velis, Girish
    Kavitha, Srinivasan
    Zebardast, Nazlee
    Sengupta, Sabyasachi
    Venkatesh, Rengaraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [38] Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo
    Sean McCafferty
    Jason Levine
    Jim Schwiegerling
    Eniko T. Enikov
    BMC Ophthalmology, 17
  • [39] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Vodencarevic, Amra Nadarevic
    Jusufovic, Vahid
    Terzic, Svjetlana
    Halilbasic, Meliha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 163 : 192 - 192
  • [40] Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo
    McCafferty, Sean
    Levine, Jason
    Schwiegerling, Jim
    Enikov, Eniko T.
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 17