Influence of Ocular Stiffness on Intraocular Pressure Estimation Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

被引:0
|
作者
Shirane, Masako [1 ]
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Otani, Keiko [2 ]
Kurita, Yuichi [3 ]
Kaneko, Makoto [4 ]
Takenaka, Joji [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Res Inst Radiat Biol & Med, Dept Environmetr & Biometr, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Engn, Hiroshima 7398527, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Ocular stiffness; Intraocular pressure estimation; Goldmann applanation tonometry; High-resolution camera; Glaucoma; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; CORNEAL THICKNESS; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RESPONSE ANALYZER; CURVATURE; GLAUCOMA; MODULUS; TENSION; NONCONTACT; ELASTICITY;
D O I
10.5405/jmbe.1381
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is important for management of glaucoma. Ocular stiffness is considered to be an important biomechanical factor influencing corneal deformation during TOP measurements by a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). The purpose of this study was to investigate how ocular stiffness is related to clinical parameters. Ocular stiffness was defined as the ratio between the change in the force applied to the cornea and the resultant displacement of the corneal apex. Fifty-nine Japanese subjects had their ocular stiffness measured. A GAT was used to apply pressure to the cornea and a high-resolution camera was used to measure corneal apex displacement by photographing the cornea in profile. Multiple regression analyses were used to assess how ocular stiffness is associated with seven factors: TOP measured by the GAT (IOPGAT), radius of curvature of the cornea (R), ocular axial length, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, age, and gender. Ocular stiffness was found to be proportional to the product of (IOPGAT)(0.66) and (R)(0.92); the other factors were not significantly associated with ocular stiffness. For an individual eye, because the value of the radius of corneal curvature was unchanged, ocular stiffness was proportional to (IOPGAT)(0.66). This means that the rate at which ocular stiffness diminishes is greater in the lower, compared to the higher, IOPGAT range. Hence, the rate at which the true TOP diminishes is greater in the lower IOPGAT range because the true IOP is considered to be the primary factor influencing ocular stiffness. This suggests that, in patients with lower IOPGAT, the change of true IOP should become progressively greater than the value indicated by IOPGAT. This result allows improved evaluation of treatment effectiveness in normal-tension glaucoma patients.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 299
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    Fernandez-Vidal, Ana
    Mendez-Hernandez, Carmen
    Garcia-Sanchez, Julian
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (10) : 4410 - 4414
  • [3] Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser
    Ehrlich, J. R.
    Haseltine, S.
    Shimmyo, M.
    Radcliffe, N. M.
    EYE, 2010, 24 (10) : 1555 - 1560
  • [4] Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser
    J R Ehrlich
    S Haseltine
    M Shimmyo
    N M Radcliffe
    Eye, 2010, 24 : 1555 - 1560
  • [5] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement by Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    DeBry, PW
    Krishna, R
    Willoughby, TL
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U372 - U372
  • [6] Effect of High Altitude Exposure on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Willmann, Gabriel
    Schommer, Kai
    Schultheiss, Maximilian
    Fischer, M. Dominik
    Bartz-Schmidt, Karl-Ulrich
    Gekeler, Florian
    Schatz, Andreas
    HIGH ALTITUDE MEDICINE & BIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) : 114 - 120
  • [7] Intraocular pressure measurement - Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Schneider, E
    Grehn, F
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [8] Comparison of Goldmann applanation and Ocular Response Analyser tonometry: intraocular pressure agreement and patient preference
    McCann, Paul
    Hogg, Ruth E.
    Wright, David M.
    McGuinness, Bernadette
    Young, Ian S.
    Kee, Frank
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    EYE, 2020, 34 (03) : 584 - 590
  • [9] Comparison of Goldmann applanation and Ocular Response Analyser tonometry: intraocular pressure agreement and patient preference
    Paul McCann
    Ruth E. Hogg
    David M. Wright
    Bernadette McGuinness
    Ian S. Young
    Frank Kee
    Augusto Azuara-Blanco
    Eye, 2020, 34 : 584 - 590
  • [10] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconic Eyes
    Goldich, Yakov
    Barkana, Yaniv
    Avni, Isaac
    Zadok, David
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (09) : 1011 - 1015