Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application

被引:27
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [2 ]
Troendle, James F. [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Biostat & Bioinformat Branch, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NHLBI, Off Biostat Res, Div Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Double robustness; Inverse probability weighting; Missing data; Outcome regression; Propensity score; Stratification; Subclassification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01712.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Causal inference in pharmacoepidemiology
    Pazzagli, Laura
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Hernan, Miguel
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 414 - 415
  • [42] Causal dynamic inference
    Bochman, Alexander
    Gabbay, Dov M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 66 (1-4) : 231 - 256
  • [43] Introduction to Causal Inference
    Spirtes, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2010, 11 : 1643 - 1662
  • [44] NONEXPERIMENTAL CAUSAL INFERENCE
    PAISLEY, MB
    PAISLEY, WJ
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1971, 35 (03) : 478 - &
  • [45] ON THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    WEED, DL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1986, 123 (06) : 965 - 979
  • [46] An introduction to causal inference
    Sobel, ME
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (03) : 353 - 379
  • [47] Ancestral Causal Inference
    Magliacane, Sara
    Claassen, Tom
    Mooij, Joris M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [48] Causal Inference by Compression
    Budhathoki, Kailash
    Vreeken, Jilles
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2016, : 41 - 50
  • [49] Improving causal inference
    Ebrahim, Shah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (02) : 363 - 366
  • [50] An Introduction to Causal Inference
    Pearl, Judea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (02):