Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application

被引:27
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [2 ]
Troendle, James F. [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Biostat & Bioinformat Branch, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NHLBI, Off Biostat Res, Div Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Double robustness; Inverse probability weighting; Missing data; Outcome regression; Propensity score; Stratification; Subclassification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01712.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Challenge of Causal Inference
    Dammann, Olaf
    Leviton, Alan
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 68 (05) : 770 - 770
  • [32] Private Causal Inference
    Kusner, Matt J.
    Sun, Yu
    Sridharan, Karthik
    Weinberger, Kilian Q.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 51, 2016, 51 : 1308 - 1317
  • [33] THE RATIONALITY OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    SHULTZ, TR
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1991, 14 (03) : 503 - 503
  • [34] Causal Graph Inference
    Poilinca, Simona
    Parajuli, Jhanak
    Abreu, Giuseppe
    [J]. 2015 49TH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, 2015, : 1209 - 1213
  • [35] The Future of Causal Inference
    Mitra, Nandita
    Roy, Jason
    Small, Dylan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 191 (10) : 1671 - 1676
  • [36] An Introduction to Causal Inference
    Pearl, Judea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (02):
  • [37] THE EROSION OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    Weed, D. L.
    Alexander, D.
    Perez, V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 : S187 - S187
  • [38] THE FOUNDATIONS OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    Pearl, Judea
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 40, 2010, 40 : 75 - 149
  • [39] Indeterminism and causal inference
    Pedro, Inaki San
    Suarez, Mauricio
    [J]. TEOREMA, 2014, 33 (01): : 95 - 109
  • [40] Prediction and causal inference
    Gagliardi, Luigi
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2009, 98 (12) : 1890 - 1892