Effect of the anti-scatter grid and target/filters in full-field digital mammography

被引:4
|
作者
Chakraborty, DP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
FFDM; measurements; CAMPI; digital mammography; grid; target-filter;
D O I
10.1117/12.349570
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Computer Analysis Of Mammography Phantom Images (CAMPI) is a method for making quantitative measurements of image quality. This paper reports on further applications of the method to a prototype: full-field digital mammography (FFDM) machine. The specific aim was to investigate the effect on speck Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) of grid vs. non-grid techniques and different target-filter imaging conditions, for 4-cm thick phantoms. Images of a 50-50 composition, 4-cm thick phantom containing a mammography accreditation phantom insert plate, were acquired on a General Electric FFDM machine under conditions of constant pixel value and constant mean glandular dose. They were obtained under conditions of grid and no-grid with the Mo-Mo target/filter. Also acquired were 4-cm phantom grid images at constant dose using different targets-filter combinations (Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh) and different phantom material glandular-fat compositions (percentages: 30-70, 50-50, 70-30). Analyses of the images yielded signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) for the specks and a non-uniformity measure. The SNR was converted to a Figure of Merit (FOM) by dividing by the square root of the mean glandular dose. For the grid-non-grid study, the FOM plots showed a broad maximum at about 26-28 kVp, meaning that this range is optimal in dose efficiency for imaging a 4-cm breast of 50-50 composition. The non-grid FOM values were greater than the grid values, meaning that the former was more dose-efficient. For the Target/Filter study the FOM also showed broad maxima as a function of kVp. The overall trends were as follows: (1) the Mo-Rh combination was superior to the Mo-Mo combination for all tissue compositions and kVps, and was generally superior to Rh-Rh except for kVp >30. (2) The optimal kVp moves towards higher values for more glandular (dense) breast equivalent material; (3) At the optimal kVp, Mo-Rh is the superior combination, outperforming both Mo-Mo and Rh-Rh for imaging a 4-cm breast. The non-uniformity was higher by 60% for the non-grid condition, and this negated its dose efficiency advantage: In the non-grid mode the non-uniformity is quite dependent on the phantom dimensions and position, implying that scatter is a si,significant contributing factor. The Rh-Rh combination also yielded a higher non-uniformity than did Mo-Mo and Mo-Rh. The Mo-Rh target filter combination appears to be the best overall choice for imaging the 4-cm breast of arbitrary composition. In-spite of its superior dose efficiency, we recommend-against using the non-grid technique until a better uniformity correction procedure is adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 885
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementation of telemanagement for full-field digital mammography (FFDM)
    Fan, Y
    Lou, SL
    Wong, A
    Zhang, H
    Sickles, EA
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PACS DESIGN AND EVALUATION - ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ISSUES, 2000, 3980 : 400 - 407
  • [32] Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system
    Muller, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [33] Physical characteristics of a full-field digital mammography system
    Suryanarayanan, S
    Karellas, A
    Vedantham, S
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2004, 533 (03): : 560 - 570
  • [34] Causes of differences between full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography interpretations in the Colorado/Massachusetts full-field digital mammography screening trial
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, P
    Moss, LJ
    Hendrick, RE
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 199 - 199
  • [35] Initial clinical experience with full-field digital mammography
    Moore, RH
    Kopans, DB
    Niklason, LT
    Slanetz, PJ
    McCarthy, KA
    Hall, DA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 570 - 570
  • [36] DQE evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system
    Roehrig, H
    Gandhi, K
    Fan, JH
    Poolla, A
    Mimura, S
    PENETRATING RADIATION SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS VI, 2004, 5541 : 141 - 152
  • [37] Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system
    Lai, Chao-Jen
    Shaw, Chris C.
    Geiser, William
    Chen, Lingyun
    Arribas, Elsa
    Stephens, Tanya
    Davis, Paul L.
    Ayyar, Geetha P.
    Dogan, Basak E.
    Nguyen, Victoria A.
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Yang, Wei T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2339 - 2346
  • [38] Digital selenium radiography: anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study
    Bernhardt, TM
    Rapp-Bernhardt, U
    Hausmann, T
    Reichel, G
    Krause, UW
    Doehring, W
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (873): : 963 - 968
  • [39] Full-field digital mammography with grid-less acquisition and software-based scatter correction: Investigation of dose saving and image quality
    Fieselmann, Andreas
    Fischer, Daniel
    Hilal, Ghani
    Dennerlein, Frank
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Uhlenbrock, Detlev
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [40] Comparison of the microcalcifications between full-field digital mammography and screen film mammography
    Tohno, E
    Kujiraoka, Y
    Watanabe, Y
    Itai, Y
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 189 - 189