Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:82
|
作者
Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur [1 ]
Budhathoki, Pravash [2 ]
Khadka, Sitaram [3 ]
Shah, Prajwol Bikram [4 ]
Pokharel, Nisheem [5 ]
Rashmi, Prama [4 ]
机构
[1] Mangalbare Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Morang, Nepal
[2] Dr Iwamura Mem Hosp, Bhaktapur, Nepal
[3] Shree Birendra Hosp, Nepalese Army Inst Hlth Sci, Kathmandu, Nepal
[4] Nepal Med Coll & Teaching Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
[5] KIST Med Coll & Teaching Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
Antiviral agents; COVID-19; COVID-19 drug treatment; Favipiravir; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2;
D O I
10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of the drug FVP as a treatment for COVID-19. Methods Databases like Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, preprint sites, and clinicaltirals.gov were searched. The studies with the standard of care (SOC) and FVP as a treatment drug were considered as the treatment group and the SOC with other antivirals and supportive care as the control group. Quantitative synthesis was done using RevMan 5.4. Clinical improvement, negative conversion of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), adverse effects, and oxygen requirements were studied. Results We identified a total of 1798 studies after searching the electronic databases. Nine in the qualitative studies and four studies in the quantitative synthesis met the criteria. There was a significant clinical improvement in the FVP group on the 14th day compared to the control group (RR 1.29, 1.08-1.54). Clinical deterioration rates were less likely in the FVP group though statistically not significant (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.14) at the endpoint of study (7-15 days). The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups on viral clearance (day 14: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84-1.33), non-invasive ventilation or oxygen requirement (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42-1.39), and adverse effects (OR 0.69, 0.13-3.57). There are 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in different parts of the world focusing FVP for COVID-19 treatment. Conclusion There is a significant clinical and radiological improvement following treatment with FVP in comparison to the standard of care with no significant differences on viral clearance, oxygen support requirement and side effect profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of some antiviral drugs on health care utilization for patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei, Bincai
    Zhang, Ruhao
    Zeng, Huatang
    Wu, Liqun
    He, Rongxin
    Zheng, Junyao
    Xue, Hao
    Liu, Jinlin
    Liang, Fengchao
    Zhu, Bin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2023, 21 (09) : 993 - 1009
  • [42] The efffiicacy of anakinra compared to standard care of treatment for COVID-19: a meta-analysis
    Malik, Hamna
    Abdul Jabbar, Hira Bint
    Latif, Farah
    Sarfraz, Azza
    Sarfraz, Zouina
    Sarfraz, Muzna
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 52 (03) : 547 - 553
  • [43] The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials (vol 11, 11022, 2021)
    Hassanipour, Soheil
    Arab-Zozani, Morteza
    Amani, Bahman
    Heidarzad, Forough
    Fathalipour, Mohammad
    Martinez-de-Hoyo, Rudolph
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [44] Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19: A Systematic Review
    Arias, Francisco A.
    Teran-Chavez, Pier
    Maggi-Panato, Alessandra
    Flores-Ortega, Diego
    Rojas-Ortega, Alex
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 32 (32) : 39 - 51
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab versus standard care/placebo in patients with COVID-19; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Vela, Driton
    Vela-Gaxha, Zana
    Rexhepi, Mjellma
    Olloni, Rozafa
    Hyseni, Violeta
    Nallbani, Rajmonda
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (05) : 1955 - 1963
  • [46] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fear of COVID-19
    Luo, Faxiang
    Gheshlagh, Reza Ghanei
    Dalvand, Sahar
    Saedmoucheshi, Sholeh
    Li, Qingyun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [47] COVID-19 and comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gold, Morgan Spencer
    Sehayek, Daniel
    Gabrielli, Sofianne
    Zhang, Xun
    McCusker, Christine
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2020, 132 (08) : 749 - 755
  • [48] Stroke in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nannoni, Stefania
    de Groot, Rosa
    Bell, Steven
    Markus, Hugh S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2021, 16 (02) : 137 - 149
  • [49] Endometriosis and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kabani, Ziyaana
    Ramos-Nino, Maria E.
    Ramdass, Prakash V. A. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (21)
  • [50] NSAIDs and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Moore, Nicholas
    Bosco-Levy, Pauline
    Thurin, Nicolas
    Blin, Patrick
    Droz-Perroteau, Cecile
    DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 44 (09) : 929 - 938