Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fear of COVID-19

被引:125
|
作者
Luo, Faxiang [1 ]
Gheshlagh, Reza Ghanei [2 ]
Dalvand, Sahar [3 ,4 ]
Saedmoucheshi, Sholeh [5 ]
Li, Qingyun [6 ]
机构
[1] Yichun Peoples Hosp, Disinfect Supply Ctr, Yichun, Peoples R China
[2] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Spiritual Hlth Res Ctr, Res Inst Hlth Dev, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Funct Neurosurg Res Ctr, Shohada Tajrish Comprehens Neurosurg Ctr Excellen, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tehran, Iran
[5] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Salamat Hosp, Kermanshah, Iran
[6] Third Peoples Hosp Yichun, Womens Ward Dept Psychosomat, Yichun, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
fear; COVID-19; systematic review; meta-analysis; fear of COVID-19; RESPIRATORY SYNDROME SARS; HEALTH-CARE; MENTAL-HEALTH; ASSOCIATION; OUTBREAK; SUICIDE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661078
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Due to lack of preparedness of health systems, fast spread of the new virus, high mortality rates, and lack of a definite treatment, the outbreak of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) led to high levels of fear and anxiety in different populations. In addition, isolation, mental disorders, and limitations in social interactions as a result of lockdown and travel ban increased the fear of the new coronavirus. Methods: International databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google scholar, were searched without any time limitation, and all observational studies published in English reporting the mean of fear of COVID-19 based on the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S) were included in the analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Random effects model, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Heterogeneity across studies was examined using Cochran's Q test and I-2 statistic. All the statistical analyses were conducted using R software v4.0.3. Results: A total of 44 articles with a sample size of 52,462 were reviewed. A pooled mean of 18.57 was found for fear of COVID-19. The mean of fear of COVID-19 was higher in women than in men (20.67 vs. 18.21). The highest and lowest means of fear of COVID-19 had been found in Asia (18.36) and Australia (17.43) based on continent, and in hospital staff (19.51) and college students (17.95) based on target population, respectively. In addition, the highest and lowest means of fear of COVID-19 were related to items #1 and #3 of the scale, respectively. According to the results of meta-regression analysis, there was no significant association between the mean of fear of COVID-19 and sample size and participants' age. In addition, publication error was not significant (P = 0.721). Conclusion: The mean of fear of COVID-19 was high around the world; therefore, it seems necessary to pay more attention to the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fear of COVID-19 Among College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Le
    Ding, Lu
    Wang, Lei
    Deng, Yang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [2] COVID-19 and comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gold, Morgan Spencer
    Sehayek, Daniel
    Gabrielli, Sofianne
    Zhang, Xun
    McCusker, Christine
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2020, 132 (08) : 749 - 755
  • [3] NSAIDs and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Moore, Nicholas
    Bosco-Levy, Pauline
    Thurin, Nicolas
    Blin, Patrick
    Droz-Perroteau, Cecile
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 44 (09) : 929 - 938
  • [4] Endometriosis and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kabani, Ziyaana
    Ramos-Nino, Maria E.
    Ramdass, Prakash V. A. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (21)
  • [5] Stroke in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nannoni, Stefania
    de Groot, Rosa
    Bell, Steven
    Markus, Hugh S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2021, 16 (02) : 137 - 149
  • [6] Obesity in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ho, Jamie S. Y.
    Fernando, Daniel, I
    Chan, Mark Y.
    Sia, Ching-Hui
    [J]. ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2020, 49 (12) : 996 - 1008
  • [7] NSAIDs and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nicholas Moore
    Pauline Bosco-Levy
    Nicolas Thurin
    Patrick Blin
    Cécile Droz-Perroteau
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2021, 44 : 929 - 938
  • [8] Tocilizumab for severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lan, Shao-Huan
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Huang, Hui-Ting
    Chang, Shen-Peng
    Lu, Li-Chin
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2020, 56 (03)
  • [9] Asthma and COVID-19 risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sunjaya, Anthony P.
    Allida, Sabine M.
    Di Tanna, Gian Luca
    Jenkins, Christine R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (03)
  • [10] COVID-19 in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Capobianco, Giampiero
    Saderi, Laura
    Aliberti, Stefano
    Mondoni, Michele
    Piana, Andrea
    Dessole, Francesco
    Dessole, Margherita
    Cherchi, Pier Luigi
    Dessole, Salvatore
    Sotgiu, Giovanni
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 252 : 543 - 558