Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:82
|
作者
Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur [1 ]
Budhathoki, Pravash [2 ]
Khadka, Sitaram [3 ]
Shah, Prajwol Bikram [4 ]
Pokharel, Nisheem [5 ]
Rashmi, Prama [4 ]
机构
[1] Mangalbare Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Morang, Nepal
[2] Dr Iwamura Mem Hosp, Bhaktapur, Nepal
[3] Shree Birendra Hosp, Nepalese Army Inst Hlth Sci, Kathmandu, Nepal
[4] Nepal Med Coll & Teaching Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
[5] KIST Med Coll & Teaching Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
Antiviral agents; COVID-19; COVID-19 drug treatment; Favipiravir; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2;
D O I
10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of the drug FVP as a treatment for COVID-19. Methods Databases like Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, preprint sites, and clinicaltirals.gov were searched. The studies with the standard of care (SOC) and FVP as a treatment drug were considered as the treatment group and the SOC with other antivirals and supportive care as the control group. Quantitative synthesis was done using RevMan 5.4. Clinical improvement, negative conversion of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), adverse effects, and oxygen requirements were studied. Results We identified a total of 1798 studies after searching the electronic databases. Nine in the qualitative studies and four studies in the quantitative synthesis met the criteria. There was a significant clinical improvement in the FVP group on the 14th day compared to the control group (RR 1.29, 1.08-1.54). Clinical deterioration rates were less likely in the FVP group though statistically not significant (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.14) at the endpoint of study (7-15 days). The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups on viral clearance (day 14: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84-1.33), non-invasive ventilation or oxygen requirement (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42-1.39), and adverse effects (OR 0.69, 0.13-3.57). There are 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in different parts of the world focusing FVP for COVID-19 treatment. Conclusion There is a significant clinical and radiological improvement following treatment with FVP in comparison to the standard of care with no significant differences on viral clearance, oxygen support requirement and side effect profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Favipiravir-based treatment for outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lan, Shao-Huan
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Chang, Shen-Peng
    Lu, Li-Chin
    Hung, Shun-Hsing
    Lin, Wei-Ting
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 15 (06) : 759 - 766
  • [22] Addition of Tocilizumab to the Standard of Care Reduces Mortality in Severe COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Perisetti, Abhilash
    Nanjappa, Arpitha
    Gajendran, Mahesh
    Kutti Sridharan, Gurusaravanan
    Goyal, Hemant
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [23] A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoids treatment in severe COVID-19: methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone
    Shukun Hong
    Hongye Wang
    Shuyuan Li
    Jian Liu
    Lujun Qiao
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 23
  • [24] A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoids treatment in severe COVID-19: methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone
    Hong, Shukun
    Wang, Hongye
    Li, Shuyuan
    Liu, Jian
    Qiao, Lujun
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [25] Systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of favipiravir in the management of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) patients
    Prakash, Ajay
    Singh, Harvinder
    Kaur, Hardeep
    Semwal, Ankita
    Sarma, Phulen
    Bhattacharyya, Anusuya
    Dhibar, Deba Prasad
    Medhi, Bikash
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 52 (05) : 414 - 421
  • [26] Third force in the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ibekwe, Titus
    Ibekwe, Perpetua
    Orimadegun, Emmanuel Adebola
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 65
  • [27] Tocilizumab treatment for COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei, Qiu
    Lin, Hua
    Wei, Rong-Guo
    Chen, Nian
    He, Fan
    Zou, Dong-Hua
    Wei, Jin-Ru
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [28] The Role of Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shamshirian, Amir
    Hessami, Amirhossein
    Heydari, Keyvan
    Alizadeh-Navaei, Reza
    Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad Ali
    Yip, George W.
    Ghasemian, Roya
    Sedaghat, Meghdad
    Baradaran, Hananeh
    Yazdi, Soheil Mohammadi
    Aboufazeli, Elham
    Jafarpour, Hamed
    Dadgostar, Ehsan
    Tirandazi, Behnaz
    Sadeghnezhad, Reza
    Karimifar, Keyvan
    Eftekhari, Aida
    Shamshirian, Danial
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2020, 49 (10) : 789 - 800
  • [29] Ivermectin for Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cruciani, Mario
    Pati, Ilaria
    Masiello, Francesca
    Malena, Marina
    Pupella, Simonetta
    De Angelis, Vincenzo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [30] Anakinra for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karolina Dahms
    Agata Mikolajewska
    Kelly Ansems
    Maria-Inti Metzendorf
    Carina Benstoem
    Miriam Stegemann
    European Journal of Medical Research, 28