Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion

被引:83
|
作者
El Haddad, Danielle [1 ]
Iliescu, Cezar [1 ]
Yusuf, Syed Wamique [1 ]
William, William Nassib, Jr. [2 ]
Khair, Tarif H. [3 ]
Song, Juhee [4 ]
Mouhayar, Elie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Sch Houston, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
catheter drainage; prothrombin time; safety; thrombocytopenia; PLATELET TRANSFUSION; CATHETER DRAINAGE; MANAGEMENT; MALIGNANCY; GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pericardial effusion (PE) is common in cancer patients, but the optimal therapeutic approach is not well defined. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis is less invasive than surgery, but its long-term effectiveness and safety have not been well documented. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE and assess the procedure's safety in patients with thrombocytopenia. METHODS Cancer patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE between November 2009 and October 2014 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Procedure-related complications, effusion recurrence rate, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,645 cancer patients referred for PE, 212 (13%) underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis. The procedure was successful in 99% of the cases, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Four patients had major procedure-related bleeding that did not vary by platelet count < 50,000/mu l or >= 50,000/mu l (p = 0.1281). Patients with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days had the lowest recurrence rate (10%). Median overall survival was 143 days; older age (i.e., >65 years), lung cancer, platelet count < 20,000/mu l, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poor prognosis. Lung cancer patients with proven malignant effusions had a significantly shorter median 1-year survival compared with those with nonmalignant effusions (16.2% vs. 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test p = 0.0101). A similar difference in 1-year survival was not observed in patients with breast cancer (40.2% vs. 40.0%; log-rank test p = 0.4170). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage was safe and effective as the primary treatment for PE in cancer patients, including in those with thrombocytopenia. Malignant PE significantly shortened the survival outcome of patients with lung cancer but not those with breast cancer. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERICARDIOCENTESIS FOR SYMPTOMATIC MALIGNANT PERICARDIAL-EFFUSION - A STUDY OF 3L PATIENTS
    CELERMAJER, DS
    BOYER, MJ
    BAILEY, BP
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1991, 154 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [42] Causes of moderate to large pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis in 140 Han Chinese patients
    Ma, W.
    Liu, J.
    Zeng, Y.
    Chen, S.
    Zheng, Y.
    Ye, S.
    Lan, L.
    Liu, Q.
    Weig, H. -J.
    Liu, Q.
    HERZ, 2012, 37 (02) : 183 - 187
  • [43] CHYLOPERICARDIUM COMPLICATING PERICARDIOCENTESIS FOR ACUTE IDIOPATHIC PERICARDIAL-EFFUSION
    TAGGART, SCO
    ROBERTS, TE
    MARSHALL, DAS
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 108 (02): : 388 - 389
  • [44] PERCUTANEOUS BALLOON PERICARDIAL WINDOW FOR PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT PERICARDIAL-EFFUSION AND TAMPONADE
    PALACIOS, IF
    TUZCU, EM
    ZISKIND, AA
    YOUNGER, J
    BLOCK, PC
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1991, 22 (04): : 244 - 249
  • [45] PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WITHOUT HEMODYNAMIC INSTABILITY: WHEN AND TO WHOM THE PERICARDIOCENTESIS?
    Facchini, E.
    Maffe, S.
    Paffoni, P.
    Prenna, E.
    Bergamasco, L.
    Careri, G.
    Pardo, N. Franchetti
    Paino, A.
    Dellavesa, P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2022, 24 (SUPPL C)
  • [46] Pericardial Effusion in a Patient with Hypothyroidism Successfully Treated Without Pericardiocentesis
    Patange, Aparna
    Bahulekar, Ajinkya
    Prajapati, Piyush
    Gandhi, Saurabh
    Chouhan, Monika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (09) : 187 - 189
  • [47] Diagnostic value of lactate dehydrogenase level of pericardial fluid in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis
    Park, D. -G.
    Cho, H. J.
    Kim, M. K.
    Hong, J. Y.
    Kim, S. E.
    Lee, J. H.
    Han, K. R.
    Oh, D. J.
    Choi, H. H.
    Hong, K. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 337 - 337
  • [48] Comparison of Outcomes of Pericardiocentesis Versus Surgical Pericardial Window in Patients Requiring Drainage of Pericardial Effusions
    Horr, Samuel E.
    Mentias, Amgad
    Houghtaling, Penny L.
    Toth, Andrew J.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Johnston, Douglas R.
    Klein, Allan L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 120 (05): : 883 - 890
  • [49] Clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous drainage of pericardial effusion in cancer patients: A single-center retrospective analysis
    Hasegawa, Tetsuya
    Arai, Yasuaki
    Sone, Miyuki
    Sugawara, Shunsuke
    Itou, Chihiro
    Wada, Shinji
    Umakoshi, Noriyuki
    Kubo, Takatoshi
    Kimura, Shintaro
    Kusumoto, Masahiko
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (01) : 257 - 262
  • [50] Brugada phenocopy in a patient underdoing pericardiocentesis for a large idiopathic pericardial effusion
    Lazaros, George
    Lazarou, Emilia
    Tousoulis, Dimitris
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2020, 63 : 184 - 185