Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion

被引:83
|
作者
El Haddad, Danielle [1 ]
Iliescu, Cezar [1 ]
Yusuf, Syed Wamique [1 ]
William, William Nassib, Jr. [2 ]
Khair, Tarif H. [3 ]
Song, Juhee [4 ]
Mouhayar, Elie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Sch Houston, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
catheter drainage; prothrombin time; safety; thrombocytopenia; PLATELET TRANSFUSION; CATHETER DRAINAGE; MANAGEMENT; MALIGNANCY; GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pericardial effusion (PE) is common in cancer patients, but the optimal therapeutic approach is not well defined. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis is less invasive than surgery, but its long-term effectiveness and safety have not been well documented. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE and assess the procedure's safety in patients with thrombocytopenia. METHODS Cancer patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE between November 2009 and October 2014 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Procedure-related complications, effusion recurrence rate, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,645 cancer patients referred for PE, 212 (13%) underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis. The procedure was successful in 99% of the cases, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Four patients had major procedure-related bleeding that did not vary by platelet count < 50,000/mu l or >= 50,000/mu l (p = 0.1281). Patients with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days had the lowest recurrence rate (10%). Median overall survival was 143 days; older age (i.e., >65 years), lung cancer, platelet count < 20,000/mu l, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poor prognosis. Lung cancer patients with proven malignant effusions had a significantly shorter median 1-year survival compared with those with nonmalignant effusions (16.2% vs. 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test p = 0.0101). A similar difference in 1-year survival was not observed in patients with breast cancer (40.2% vs. 40.0%; log-rank test p = 0.4170). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage was safe and effective as the primary treatment for PE in cancer patients, including in those with thrombocytopenia. Malignant PE significantly shortened the survival outcome of patients with lung cancer but not those with breast cancer. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A case of pericardiocentesis for hemophilia a patient with tuberculous pericardial effusion
    Park, J.
    Park, Y.
    Lee, S.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2009, 7 : 821 - 821
  • [32] Pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis in a girl with anorexia nervosa
    Polli, Nicoletta
    Blengino, Simonetta
    Moro, Mirella
    Zappulli, Daniela
    Scacchi, Massimo
    Cavagnini, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2006, 39 (07) : 609 - 611
  • [33] Diagnostic value of the biochemical composition of pericardial effusions in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis
    Ben-Horin, Shomron
    Bank, Ilan
    Shinfeld, Ami
    Kachel, Erez
    Guetta, Victor
    Livneh, Avi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (09): : 1294 - 1297
  • [34] Echo-guided pericardiocentesis in patients with clinically significant pericardial effusion Outcomes over a 10-year period
    Akyuz, S.
    Zengin, A.
    Arugaslan, E.
    Yazici, S.
    Onuk, T.
    Ceylan, U. S.
    Gungor, B.
    Gurkan, U.
    Oz, T. Kemaloglu
    Kasikcioglu, H.
    Cam, N.
    HERZ, 2015, 40 : 153 - 159
  • [35] Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in patients with recurrent pericardial effusion
    del Amo, LFN
    Polo, MC
    Orejas, MO
    Fernández, TL
    Mohandes, M
    Romo, AI
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2002, 55 (01): : 25 - 28
  • [36] Evolution of pericardial effusion in cancer patients
    Fernandez Garcia, M.
    Salgdo, M.
    Gonzalez, F.
    Aparicio, A.
    Nieves, B.
    Helguera, C.
    Alen, A.
    Cachero, A.
    Flores, R.
    Ortiz, J. F.
    Lorca, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 46 - 46
  • [37] PREDICTORS OF CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS FOLLOWING PERICARDIOCENTESIS FOR SIGNIFICANT PERICARDIAL EFFUSION
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Sinak, Lawrence
    Nestbitt, Gellian
    Espinosa, Raul E.
    Tajik, A. Jamil
    Oh, Jae K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [38] THE INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSIS OF CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS AFTER PERICARDIOCENTESIS FOR PERICARDIAL EFFUSION
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Sinak, Lawrence
    Nesbitt, Gillian
    Espinosa, Raul E.
    Tajik, A. Jamil
    Oh, Jae K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [39] Pericardiocentesis for severe pericardial effusion due to suspected inflammatory etiology
    Lechner, D.
    Gasser, S.
    Frick, M.
    Poelzl, G.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 125 : S64 - S64
  • [40] Pericardiocentesis versus pericardiotomy for malignant pericardial effusion: a retrospective comparison
    Labbe, C.
    Tremblay, L.
    Lacasse, Y.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 412 - 416