Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion

被引:83
|
作者
El Haddad, Danielle [1 ]
Iliescu, Cezar [1 ]
Yusuf, Syed Wamique [1 ]
William, William Nassib, Jr. [2 ]
Khair, Tarif H. [3 ]
Song, Juhee [4 ]
Mouhayar, Elie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Sch Houston, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
catheter drainage; prothrombin time; safety; thrombocytopenia; PLATELET TRANSFUSION; CATHETER DRAINAGE; MANAGEMENT; MALIGNANCY; GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pericardial effusion (PE) is common in cancer patients, but the optimal therapeutic approach is not well defined. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis is less invasive than surgery, but its long-term effectiveness and safety have not been well documented. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE and assess the procedure's safety in patients with thrombocytopenia. METHODS Cancer patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE between November 2009 and October 2014 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Procedure-related complications, effusion recurrence rate, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,645 cancer patients referred for PE, 212 (13%) underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis. The procedure was successful in 99% of the cases, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Four patients had major procedure-related bleeding that did not vary by platelet count < 50,000/mu l or >= 50,000/mu l (p = 0.1281). Patients with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days had the lowest recurrence rate (10%). Median overall survival was 143 days; older age (i.e., >65 years), lung cancer, platelet count < 20,000/mu l, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poor prognosis. Lung cancer patients with proven malignant effusions had a significantly shorter median 1-year survival compared with those with nonmalignant effusions (16.2% vs. 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test p = 0.0101). A similar difference in 1-year survival was not observed in patients with breast cancer (40.2% vs. 40.0%; log-rank test p = 0.4170). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage was safe and effective as the primary treatment for PE in cancer patients, including in those with thrombocytopenia. Malignant PE significantly shortened the survival outcome of patients with lung cancer but not those with breast cancer. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pericardiocentesis with cisplatin for malignant pericardial effusion and tamponade
    Takatsugu Oida
    Kenji Mimatsu
    Hiso Kano
    Atsushi Kawasaki
    Youichi Kuboi
    Nobutada Fukino
    Sadao Amano
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 16 (06) : 740 - 744
  • [22] Pericardiocentesis with cisplatin for malignant pericardial effusion and tamponade
    Oida, Takatsugu
    Mimatsu, Kenji
    Kano, Hiso
    Kawasaki, Atsushi
    Kuboi, Youichi
    Fukino, Nobutada
    Amano, Sadao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (06) : 740 - 744
  • [23] Predictors of hospital discharge in cancer patients with pericardial effusion undergoing surgical pericardial drainage
    Kazantzis, Thamara
    Bibas, Benoit Jacques
    Dela-Vega, Alberto Jorge
    Nabuco, Pedro
    Lauricella, Leticia Leone
    Pego-Fernandes, Paulo Manuel
    Terra, Ricardo Mingarini
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 119 (01) : 143 - 147
  • [24] Percutaneous balloon pericardial window for patients, with symptomatic pericardial effusion
    del Barrio, LG
    Morales, JH
    Delgado, C
    Benito, A
    Larrache, J
    Martinez-Cuesta, A
    Bilbao, JI
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (05) : 360 - 364
  • [25] Percutaneous Balloon Pericardial Window for Patients with Symptomatic Pericardial Effusion
    Loreto Garcia del Barrio
    José Hernando Morales
    Carlos Delgado
    Alberto Benito
    Javier Larrache
    Antonio Martinez-Cuesta
    José Ignacio Bilbao
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2002, 25 : 360 - 364
  • [26] COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF PERICARDIOCENTESIS VERSUS SURGICAL PERICARDIOTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND PERICARDIAL EFFUSION IN THE UNITED STATES
    Zack, Chad Joseph
    Hermany, Paul
    McClurken, James
    Guy, T. Sloane
    Cohen, Howard
    Gadegbeku, Crystal
    Bove, Alfred
    Bashir, Riyaz
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E1280 - E1280
  • [27] Facing malignant pericardial effusion. What to do first: pericardiocentesis or percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy?
    Rial Baston, V.
    Jimenez Valero, S.
    Meras Colunga, P.
    Irazusta Cordoba, J.
    Galeote Garcia, G.
    Moreno Gomez, R.
    Sanchez Recalde, A.
    Rosillo Rodriguez, S.
    Iniesta Manjavacas, A.
    Martinez, L.
    Rodriguez Sotelo, L.
    Lopez Sendon, J. L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 105 - 106
  • [28] Pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis in a guinea pig (Cavia porcellus)
    Dzyban, LA
    Garrod, LA
    Besso, JG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 37 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [29] Pericardial effusion in cancer patients
    Calabrese, P.
    Oliva, S.
    Maiello, E.
    Colucci, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 : 167 - 167
  • [30] Differential Impact of Constrictive Physiology after Pericardiocentesis in Malignancy Patients with Pericardial Effusion
    Cho, In-Jeong
    Chang, Hyuk-Jae
    Chung, Hyemoon
    Lee, Sang-Eun
    Shim, Chi Young
    Hong, Geu-Ru
    Ha, Jong-Won
    Chung, Namsik
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):