Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion

被引:83
|
作者
El Haddad, Danielle [1 ]
Iliescu, Cezar [1 ]
Yusuf, Syed Wamique [1 ]
William, William Nassib, Jr. [2 ]
Khair, Tarif H. [3 ]
Song, Juhee [4 ]
Mouhayar, Elie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Sch Houston, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
catheter drainage; prothrombin time; safety; thrombocytopenia; PLATELET TRANSFUSION; CATHETER DRAINAGE; MANAGEMENT; MALIGNANCY; GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pericardial effusion (PE) is common in cancer patients, but the optimal therapeutic approach is not well defined. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis is less invasive than surgery, but its long-term effectiveness and safety have not been well documented. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE and assess the procedure's safety in patients with thrombocytopenia. METHODS Cancer patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE between November 2009 and October 2014 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Procedure-related complications, effusion recurrence rate, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,645 cancer patients referred for PE, 212 (13%) underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis. The procedure was successful in 99% of the cases, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Four patients had major procedure-related bleeding that did not vary by platelet count < 50,000/mu l or >= 50,000/mu l (p = 0.1281). Patients with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days had the lowest recurrence rate (10%). Median overall survival was 143 days; older age (i.e., >65 years), lung cancer, platelet count < 20,000/mu l, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poor prognosis. Lung cancer patients with proven malignant effusions had a significantly shorter median 1-year survival compared with those with nonmalignant effusions (16.2% vs. 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test p = 0.0101). A similar difference in 1-year survival was not observed in patients with breast cancer (40.2% vs. 40.0%; log-rank test p = 0.4170). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage was safe and effective as the primary treatment for PE in cancer patients, including in those with thrombocytopenia. Malignant PE significantly shortened the survival outcome of patients with lung cancer but not those with breast cancer. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Patients with and without Malignancy Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion
    Shih, Chun-Ting
    Lee, Wei-Chieh
    Fang, Hsiu-Yu
    Wu, Po-Jui
    Fang, Yen-Nan
    Chong, Shaur-Zheng
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2021, 8 (11)
  • [2] Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion (vol 66, pg 1119, 2015)
    El Haddad, D.
    Iliescu, C.
    Yusuf, S. W.
    William, W. N., Jr.
    Khair, T. H.
    Song, J.
    Mouhayar, E. N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (20) : 2269 - 2269
  • [3] Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes
    Andrea Pennacchioni
    Giulia Nanni
    Fabio Alfredo Sgura
    Jacopo Francesco Imberti
    Daniel Enrique Monopoli
    Rosario Rossi
    Giuseppe Longo
    Salvatore Arrotti
    Marco Vitolo
    Giuseppe Boriani
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2021, 16 : 1771 - 1777
  • [4] Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes
    Pennacchioni, Andrea
    Nanni, Giulia
    Sgura, Fabio Alfredo
    Imberti, Jacopo Francesco
    Monopoli, Daniel Enrique
    Rossi, Rosario
    Longo, Giuseppe
    Arrotti, Salvatore
    Vitolo, Marco
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 16 (07) : 1771 - 1777
  • [5] Etiology and outcomes in patients with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis
    Rupanagudi, VJ
    Kona, H
    Kanagarajan, K
    Niranjan, S
    Krishnan, P
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 790S - 790S
  • [6] Predictors of Recurrent Pericardial Effusion in Cancer Patients Requiring Pericardiocentesis
    Ahmed, Talha
    Safdar, Ayesha
    Song, Juhee
    Banchs, Jose
    Kim, Peter
    Palaskas, Nicolas L.
    Iliescu, Cezar
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [7] Large symptomatic pericardial effusion as the presentation of unrecognized cancer - A study in 173 consecutive patients undergoing pericardiocentesis
    Ben-Horin, S
    Bank, I
    Guetta, V
    Livneh, A
    MEDICINE, 2006, 85 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [8] eComment. Surgical or percutaneous pericardiocentesis in symptomatic pericardial effusion
    Demirkol, Sait
    Balta, Sevket
    Cakar, Mustafa
    Unlu, Murat
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 16 (04) : 500 - 500
  • [9] Predictors of Recurrence and Survival in Cancer Patients With Pericardial Effusion Requiring Pericardiocentesis
    Ahmed, Talha
    Mouhayar, Elie
    Song, Juhee
    Koutroumpakis, Efstratios
    Palaskas, Nicolas L.
    Yusuf, Syed Wamique
    Lopez-Mattei, Juan
    Hassan, Saamir A.
    Kim, Peter
    Cilingiroglu, Mehmet
    Marmagkiolis, Konstantinos
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Swisher, Stephen
    Deswal, Anita
    Iliescu, Cezar
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9