Constraining the uncertainty in emissions over India with a regional air quality model evaluation

被引:24
|
作者
Karambelas, Alexandra [1 ]
Holloway, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
Kiesewetter, Gregor [3 ]
Heyes, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Nelson Inst Ctr Sustainabil & Global Environm, 1710 Univ Ave, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, 1225 West Dayton St, Madison, WI USA
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Air Pollut & Greenhouse Gases, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
India; Model; Satellite; OMI; NO2; Emissions; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; THERMAL POWER-PLANTS; NOX EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; HUMAN HEALTH; EAST-ASIA; OZONE; INVENTORY; TRANSPORT; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To evaluate uncertainty in the spatial distribution of air emissions over India, we compare satellite and surface observations with simulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Seasonally representative simulations were completed for January, April, July, and October 2010 at 36 km x 36 km using anthropogenic emissions from the Greenhouse Gas-Air Pollution Interaction and Synergies (GAINS) model following version 5a of the Evaluating the Climate and Air Quality Impacts of Short-Lived Pollutants project (ECLIPSE v5a). We use both tropospheric columns from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and surface observations from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to closely examine modeled nitrogen dioxide (NO2) biases in urban and rural regions across India. Spatial average evaluation with satellite retrievals indicate a low bias in the modeled tropospheric column (63.3%), which reflects broad low-biases in majority non-urban regions (-70.1% in rural areas) across the sub-continent to slightly lesser low biases reflected in semi-urban areas (-44.7%), with the threshold between semi-urban and rural defined as 400 people per km(2). In contrast, modeled surface NO2 concentrations exhibit a slight high bias of +15.6% when compared to surface CPCB observations predominantly located in urban areas. Conversely, in examining extremely population dense urban regions with more than 5000 people per km(2) (dense-urban), we find model overestimates in both the column (+ 57.8) and at the surface (+131.2%) compared to observations. Based on these results, we find that existing emission fields for India may overestimate urban emissions in densely populated regions and underestimate rural emissions. However, if we rely on model evaluation with predominantly urban surface observations from the CPCB, comparisons reflect model high biases, contradictory to the knowledge gained using satellite observations. Satellites thus serve as an important emissions and model evaluation metric where surface observations are lacking, such as rural India, and support improved emissions inventory development.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Regional air quality models and the regulation of atmospheric emissions
    Fisher, Bernard E. A.
    Chemel, Charles
    Sokhi, Ranjeet S.
    Francis, Xavier V.
    Vincent, Keith J.
    Dore, Anthony J.
    Griffiths, Stephen
    Sutton, Paul
    Wright, Raymond D.
    [J]. IDOJARAS, 2015, 119 (03): : 355 - 378
  • [12] Evaluation of a regional air quality model using satellite column NO2: treatment of observation errors and model boundary conditions and emissions
    Pope, R. J.
    Chipperfield, M. P.
    Savage, N. H.
    Ordonez, C.
    Neal, L. S.
    Lee, L. A.
    Dhomse, S. S.
    Richards, N. A. D.
    Keslake, T. D.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (10) : 5611 - 5626
  • [13] EMISSIONS MODELS FOR REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY STUDIES
    DICKSON, RJ
    OLIVER, WR
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 25 (09) : 1533 - 1535
  • [14] Biogenic emissions contribution on air quality at regional scale
    Sarrat, C
    Solmon, F
    Guédalia, D
    Rosset, R
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION MODELLING AND SIMULATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 123 - 140
  • [15] Quantification of the impact of climate uncertainty on regional air quality
    Liao, K. -J.
    Tagaris, E.
    Manomaiphiboon, K.
    Wang, C.
    Woo, J. -H.
    Amar, P.
    He, S.
    Russell, A. G.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2009, 9 (03) : 865 - 878
  • [16] BOLCHEM air quality model: Performance evaluation over Italy
    Maurizi, Alberto
    Mircea, Mihaela
    D'Isidoro, Massimo
    Vitali, Lina
    Monforti, Fabio
    Zanini, Gabriele
    Tampieri, Francesco
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XIX, 2008, : 702 - 704
  • [17] Evaluation of Regional Air Quality Models over Sydney and Australia: Part 1-Meteorological Model Comparison
    Monk, Khalia
    Guerette, Elise-Andree
    Paton-Walsh, Clare
    Silver, Jeremy D.
    Emmerson, Kathryn M.
    Utembe, Steven R.
    Zhang, Yang
    Griffiths, Alan D.
    Chang, Lisa T. -C.
    Duc, Hiep N.
    Toan Trieu
    Scorgie, Yvonne
    Cope, Martin E.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (07)
  • [18] Wintertime and summertime evaluation of the regional pm air quality model aurams
    Bouchet, VS
    Moran, MD
    Crevier, LP
    Dastoor, AP
    Gong, S
    Gong, W
    Makar, PA
    Menard, S
    Pabla, B
    Zhang, L
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XVI, 2004, 16 : 97 - 105
  • [19] Agricultural ammonia emissions, uncertainty, and applications to air quality modeling
    Pinder, Robert W.
    Adams, Peter J.
    Gilliland, Alice B.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 232 : 423 - 423
  • [20] Influence of ship emissions and its uncertainty on air quality in China
    Wu, Yu-Qi
    Huang, Zhi-Jiong
    Zhang, Zhi-Wei
    Zhang, Li-Hang
    Wang, Yan-Long
    Xie, Yan
    Wang, Yi-Ran
    Zheng, Jun-Yu
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2020, 40 (07): : 2870 - 2879