Constraining the uncertainty in emissions over India with a regional air quality model evaluation

被引:24
|
作者
Karambelas, Alexandra [1 ]
Holloway, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
Kiesewetter, Gregor [3 ]
Heyes, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Nelson Inst Ctr Sustainabil & Global Environm, 1710 Univ Ave, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, 1225 West Dayton St, Madison, WI USA
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Air Pollut & Greenhouse Gases, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
India; Model; Satellite; OMI; NO2; Emissions; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; THERMAL POWER-PLANTS; NOX EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; HUMAN HEALTH; EAST-ASIA; OZONE; INVENTORY; TRANSPORT; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To evaluate uncertainty in the spatial distribution of air emissions over India, we compare satellite and surface observations with simulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Seasonally representative simulations were completed for January, April, July, and October 2010 at 36 km x 36 km using anthropogenic emissions from the Greenhouse Gas-Air Pollution Interaction and Synergies (GAINS) model following version 5a of the Evaluating the Climate and Air Quality Impacts of Short-Lived Pollutants project (ECLIPSE v5a). We use both tropospheric columns from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and surface observations from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to closely examine modeled nitrogen dioxide (NO2) biases in urban and rural regions across India. Spatial average evaluation with satellite retrievals indicate a low bias in the modeled tropospheric column (63.3%), which reflects broad low-biases in majority non-urban regions (-70.1% in rural areas) across the sub-continent to slightly lesser low biases reflected in semi-urban areas (-44.7%), with the threshold between semi-urban and rural defined as 400 people per km(2). In contrast, modeled surface NO2 concentrations exhibit a slight high bias of +15.6% when compared to surface CPCB observations predominantly located in urban areas. Conversely, in examining extremely population dense urban regions with more than 5000 people per km(2) (dense-urban), we find model overestimates in both the column (+ 57.8) and at the surface (+131.2%) compared to observations. Based on these results, we find that existing emission fields for India may overestimate urban emissions in densely populated regions and underestimate rural emissions. However, if we rely on model evaluation with predominantly urban surface observations from the CPCB, comparisons reflect model high biases, contradictory to the knowledge gained using satellite observations. Satellites thus serve as an important emissions and model evaluation metric where surface observations are lacking, such as rural India, and support improved emissions inventory development.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Regional sensitivities of air quality and human health impacts to aviation emissions
    Quadros, Flavio D. A.
    Snellen, Mirjam
    Dedoussi, Irene C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
  • [42] Evaluation of gas-particle partitioning in a regional air quality model for organic pollutants
    Efstathiou, Christos I.
    Matejovicova, Jana
    Bieser, Johannes
    Lammel, Gerhard
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (23) : 15327 - 15345
  • [43] Effect of the uncertainty in meteorology on air quality model predictions
    Ferenczi, Zita
    Homolya, Emese
    Lazar, Krisztina
    Toth, Anita
    [J]. IDOJARAS, 2021, 125 (04): : 625 - 646
  • [44] Retrospective air quality simulations of the TexAQS-II: Focused on emissions uncertainty
    Lee D.
    Kim S.
    Kim H.
    Ngan F.
    [J]. Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 8 (4) : 212 - 224
  • [45] Evaluation of near surface ozone in air quality simulations forced by a regional climate model over Europe for the period 1991-2000
    Zanis, P.
    Katragkou, E.
    Tegoulias, I.
    Poupkou, A.
    Melas, D.
    Huszar, P.
    Giorgi, F.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (36) : 6489 - 6500
  • [46] Evaluation of local and regional air quality forecasts for London
    Stidworthy, Amy
    Jackson, Mark
    Johnson, Kate
    Carruthers, David
    Stocker, Jenny
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2018, 64 (1-3) : 178 - 191
  • [47] EVALUATION OF 3 REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY MODELS
    RUFF, RE
    NITZ, KC
    LUDWIG, FL
    BHUMRALKAR, CM
    SHANNON, JD
    SHEIH, CM
    LEE, IY
    KUMAR, R
    MCNAUGHTON, DJ
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (07) : 1103 - 1115
  • [48] Evaluation of local and regional air quality forecasts for London
    Stidworthy A.
    Jackson M.
    Johnson K.
    Carruthers D.
    Stocker J.
    [J]. Stidworthy, Amy (amy.stidworthy@cerc.co.uk), 2018, Inderscience Publishers, 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (64) : 178 - 191
  • [49] Uncertainty in air quality model evaluation for particulate matter due to spatial variations in pollutant concentrations
    Park, Sun-Kyoung
    Cobb, Charles Evan
    Wade, Katherine
    Mulholland, James
    Hu, Yongtao
    Russell, Armistead G.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (563-573) : S563 - S573
  • [50] Air quality evaluation as an ecological indicator of regional diagnosis
    Nava-Nava, MM
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITY II: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2002, 14 : 613 - 620