Regional air quality models and the regulation of atmospheric emissions

被引:0
|
作者
Fisher, Bernard E. A. [1 ,2 ]
Chemel, Charles [3 ]
Sokhi, Ranjeet S. [4 ]
Francis, Xavier V. [4 ]
Vincent, Keith J. [5 ]
Dore, Anthony J. [6 ]
Griffiths, Stephen [7 ]
Sutton, Paul [8 ]
Wright, Raymond D. [9 ]
机构
[1] Environm Agcy, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Little Beeches, Leatherhead KT22 8PT, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Ctr Atmospher & Instrumentat Res, Natl Ctr Atmospher Sci, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[4] Univ Hertfordshire, Ctr Atmospher & Instrumentat Res, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[5] Ricardo AEA, Harwell, Berks, England
[6] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Penicuik, Midlothian, Scotland
[7] EON Technol, Ratcliffe On Soar, Notts, England
[8] RWE Npower, Swindon, Wilts, England
[9] Spacefleet Ltd, Devizes, Wilts, England
来源
IDOJARAS | 2015年 / 119卷 / 03期
关键词
Inter-comparison; regional air quality; model; footprint; metric; diagnostic; operational; evaluation; seer; constructor; PARTICULATE MATTER; ENGLAND; DEPOSITION; TRANSPORT; OZONE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper investigates regional air quality model performance and the regulation of atmospheric emissions. Although evaluation of regional models cannot be reduced to a set of rules, the paper shows ways of developing better understanding of model performance. It draws on studies in recent years by the Environment Agency to quantify the uncertainty in predictions of regional air quality models. It is argued that a decision by a regulator on how to use a regional air quality model should be based on both operational evaluation (involving comparison with observation) and diagnostic evaluation (for developing understanding of the model), using operational and diagnostic metrics. Operational and diagnostic evaluations were undertaken, using a 'constructor' (CMAQ) and a 'seer' type (TRACK-ADMS) regional air quality model, for the secondary pollutants PM10, PM2.5 and ozone, though for episodic ozone it was not possible to define an appropriate performance metric. Neither type of model showed clearly better performance when applied to long-term average concentrations. There was not enough information to set a minimum margin of error in operational evaluations but margins of 20% or more are to be expected. Unlike operational metrics there is no obvious way of deriving diagnostic metrics. However a footprint diagnostic metric was shown to be a way to reveal the behaviour of PM10 and PM2.5 in both types of model. It is therefore suggested that seer models are used to reveal the structure of a model's underlying mathematical equations from which diagnostic metrics can be formed. In the absence of an objective basis for setting acceptance criteria for models, it is proposed that the underlying pragmatic principle should be to use whatever has comparable accuracy with the best existing international practice. For regulatory applications, the error expected in current types of air quality models should be a consideration in any decision made on the basis of models.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 378
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EMISSIONS MODELS FOR REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY STUDIES
    DICKSON, RJ
    OLIVER, WR
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 25 (09) : 1533 - 1535
  • [2] The state of atmospheric emissions and the air quality transboundary air pollution
    Roots, O
    Saare, L
    Talkop, R
    [J]. REGIONAL MODELLING OF AIR POLLUTION IN EUROPE, 1997, : 131 - 139
  • [3] Response of atmospheric particulate matter to changes in precursor emissions: A comparison of three air quality models
    Pun, Betty K.
    Seigneur, Christian
    Bailey, Elizabeth M.
    Gautney, Larry L.
    Douglas, Sharon G.
    Haney, Jay L.
    Kumar, Naresh
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (03) : 831 - 837
  • [4] Biogenic emissions contribution on air quality at regional scale
    Sarrat, C
    Solmon, F
    Guédalia, D
    Rosset, R
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION MODELLING AND SIMULATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 123 - 140
  • [5] Atmospheric composition change - global and regional air quality
    Monks, P. S.
    Granier, C.
    Fuzzi, S.
    Stohl, A.
    Williams, M. L.
    Akimoto, H.
    Amann, M.
    Baklanov, A.
    Baltensperger, U.
    Bey, I.
    Blake, N.
    Blake, R. S.
    Carslaw, K.
    Cooper, O. R.
    Dentener, F.
    Fowler, D.
    Fragkou, E.
    Frost, G. J.
    Generoso, S.
    Ginoux, P.
    Grewe, V.
    Guenther, A.
    Hansson, H. C.
    Henne, S.
    Hjorth, J.
    Hofzumahaus, A.
    Huntrieser, H.
    Isaksen, I. S. A.
    Jenkin, M. E.
    Kaiser, J.
    Kanakidou, M.
    Klimont, Z.
    Kulmala, M.
    Laj, P.
    Lawrence, M. G.
    Lee, J. D.
    Liousse, C.
    Maione, M.
    McFiggans, G.
    Metzger, A.
    Mieville, A.
    Moussiopoulos, N.
    Orlando, J. J.
    O'Dowd, C. D.
    Palmer, P. I.
    Parrish, D. D.
    Petzold, A.
    Platt, U.
    Poeschl, U.
    Prevot, A. S. H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (33) : 5268 - 5350
  • [6] Regional atmospheric pollution and transboundary air quality management
    Bergin, MS
    West, JJ
    Keating, TJ
    Russell, AG
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2005, 30 : 1 - 37
  • [7] Industrial emissions effect into atmospheric air quality: mathematical modeling
    Lukyanets, Artem
    Gura, Dmitry
    Savinova, Olga
    Kondratenko, Larisa
    Lushkov, Richard
    [J]. REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 38 (02) : 385 - 393
  • [8] Influence of future climate and emissions on regional air quality in California
    Steiner, Allison L.
    Tonse, Shaheen
    Cohen, Ronald C.
    Goldstein, Allen H.
    Harley, Robert A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D18)
  • [9] Impacts of regional climate change on biogenic emissions and air quality
    Zhang, Yang
    Hu, Xiao-Ming
    Leung, L. Ruby
    Gustafson, William I., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D18)
  • [10] Regional Atmospheric Emissions in Asia
    Streets, D.G.
    [J]. Environmental Systems Reviews, 2000, (48-49): : 1 - 65