Comparison and Analysis of Different Standards for Determining Dust Resistivity

被引:1
|
作者
Jin, Xin [1 ]
Zhong, Shengjun [1 ]
Li, Weiye [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Met & Mat, 11,Lane 3,Wenhua Rd, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
关键词
Dust Resistivity; Electrostatic Prevention; Electrostatic Precipitators; Measurements;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.508.110
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Accurate measurement of dust resistivity is important practically for electrostatic prevention and design of electrostatic precipitators. The test result of dust resistivity depends on the standard used. There are three standards widely used for determination of dust resistivity: IEC 1241-2-2, BS 5958-1 and ASME PTC28 4.05. Experimental devices are designed and constructed according to these standards. The schematics of test principles and circuits of different standards are introduced. Experimental results show that dust resistivity values determined by different standards are quite different, and in some cases the difference is even in 1 similar to 2 orders of magnitude. The test results according to IEC standard are the highest, while the results using ASME standard are the lowest. The methods given by IEC standard and BS standard are normally used in electrostatic prevention, while method given by ASME standard is applied to the design of electrostatic precipitators. It is necessary to choose the appropriate standard according to the application of dust resistivity.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF DETERMINING THE SEX TYPE OF AN OCCUPATION
    COOPER, EA
    DOVERSPIKE, D
    BARRETT, GV
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1985, 57 (03) : 747 - 750
  • [42] Comparison of different methods of determining retinal arteriolar diameters
    Chapman, N
    Witt, N
    Stanton, A
    Gau, X
    Thorn, S
    Hughes, A
    HYPERTENSION, 1999, 34 (04) : 704 - 704
  • [43] ROUTINE DUST MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS
    COCHRANE, TS
    CANADIAN MINING AND METALLURGICAL BULLETIN, 1972, 65 (717): : 46 - &
  • [44] COAL DUST STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS
    WHEELER, HP
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, 1970, 12 (11): : 458 - 461
  • [45] Analysis of Different Parameters in the Electrical Resistivity Test of Concrete
    Lencioni, Julia W.
    Medeiros-Junior, Ronaldo A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [46] Analysis of Different Parameters in the Electrical Resistivity Test of Concrete
    Julia W. Lencioni
    Ronaldo A. Medeiros-Junior
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 19 : 27 - 38
  • [47] Wind energy potential and economic analysis with a comparison of different methods for determining the optimal distribution parameters
    Saeed, Muhammad Abid
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Zhang, Weidong
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 161 : 1092 - 1109
  • [48] ANALYSIS OF RESPIRABLE DUST COLLECTED ON DIFFERENT WORKPLACES
    HLAVAY, J
    POLYAK, K
    BORSZEKI, J
    HALMOS, P
    TOTH, A
    FRESENIUS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANALYTISCHE CHEMIE, 1989, 334 (07): : 656 - 657
  • [49] Comparison of Different Electrical Resistivity Measurement Methods of Soft Marine Clays
    Duan, Wei
    Cai, Guojun
    Liu, Songyu
    Li, Kuikui
    Puppala, Anand J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MULTI-PHYSICS PROCESSES IN SOIL MECHANICS AND ADVANCES IN GEOTECHNICAL TESTING, 2018, : 477 - 485
  • [50] A comparison study of different image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography
    Caterina, David
    Beaujean, Jean
    Robert, Tanguy
    Nguyen, Frederic
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 11 (06) : 639 - 657